Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

CHIPS: A mess of buddy-cop clichés, jumbled plotting and crummy cinematography

Dax Shepard and Michael Pena star in CHIPS, a movie that comprises a mess of buddy-cop clichés and jumbled plotting.

Peter Iovino

0.5 out of 4 stars

Written by
Dax Shepard
Directed by
Dax Shepard
Michael Pena, Adam Brody, Kristen Bell, Dax Shepard

Nobody will believe me when I say this, but nevertheless: There's no particular thrill in trashing something that's bad. The image of the Critic is often one of some snivelling wannabe, contemptuous of the dreamers and creatives who actually take the risk of making things. And so he dips his quill in toxic ink and pens poison jeremiads to this debased culture, in the half-hearted hope that his animus will roust him just enough that he can make spiteful love to his tormented wife.

Well, it's not true.

Sure, there may be some kick in taking down a sacred cow. And there's a valid – even noble – critical function in scraping against the tides of public opinion, even if it's just for the sake of it. But reporting on a film (or album, or book) that is just workaday, run-of-the-mill awful is about as pleasant as choking down a lousily made hamburger. And that's the kind of bad CHIPS is. It's not uniquely bad, nor so bad it's good. It's factually, quantifiably bad. Overcooked, underdressed, sloppy, indigestible: just your classic crap hamburger of a movie.

Story continues below advertisement

Given the success of 2012's 21 Jump Street (and its 2014 sequel), the on-paper prospect of another resurrected eighties action-comedy franchise doesn't seem as dire as it might have five or 10 years ago. With their effortless buddy-cop repartee of their stars, their sufficiently high-octane action set pieces and their requisite meta-winking at their own pointlessness, the Jump Street films offer a model for other nostalgia-baiting revivals. Andrei Rublev it ain't. But 21 Jump Street was engaged with the patent silliness of its very existence in a way that seemed refreshingly self-loathing. It was also funny. And that's not nothing.

So, sure, lay an onion skin over the Jump Street formula, trace out a script based on the late seventies/early eighties NBC cop drama CHiPS, about two mismatched California Highway Patrol officers who pursue bad guys across L.A.'s warrens of highways on their police bikes. Would that it were so simple.

Written, directed and starring Dax Shepard, in some would-be Wellesian feat or totalizing film authorship, CHIPS feels as if it were three or four films smashed together and piled up on the open freeway of the imagination. (More convincingly Wellesian is Vincent D'Onofrio's crooked-cop villain, who howls, "I'm law!" like Orson Welles's corpulent police captain in Touch of Evil.) Shepard appears as motorcycle-daredevil-turned-highway-cop Jon Baker, who's partnered up with undercover federal agent Frank (Ponch) Poncherello (Michael Pena), who infiltrates the California Highway Patrol while investigating a string of armoured-car heists in the Los Angeles area.

CHIPS is a mess of buddy-cop clichés, jumbled plotting and harried motorcycle chases bogged down by hyperactive cross-cutting and crummy cinematography. Shepard and Pena share zero comic chemistry. A scene where the two bicker about whether or not analingus is a "standard" sexual act strains toward the breezy bromantic badinage of Judd Apatow (or the Jump Street movies) like a sad little sapling desperately stretching toward sunlight. Subplots about Baker's opiate addiction, and Ponch's compulsive sexuality, are introduced only to be left suspended in mid-air. During a climactic chase scene, night falls seemingly out of nowhere, as if time itself can't be bothered to keep pace with the slapdash jumble that is CHIPS.

Most curiously, CHIPS has little in the way of shrugging, self-referential meta-humour, save for a late-film cameo from the original Ponch, Erik Estrada, which predictably had preview audiences cooing with the sheer thrill of recognition. Were CHIPS altogether less miserable, its relative earnestness may scan as bracing. But it doesn't. A film this bad should at least possess the good grace to make fun of itself.

Video: Why years passed between the release of Goon and its sequel (The Canadian Press)
Report an error

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at