Skip to main content

In this image released by Netflix, Olivia Colman portrays Queen Elizabeth II in a scene from the third season of The Crown, debuting Sunday on Netflix.

Sophie Mutevelian/The Associated Press

It’s not as though we have a shortage of information about the Royal Family. We already know that Meghan and Harry are not doing Christmas with the rest of the family. And that some elements of the British media believe their plan is “a snub to the Queen.” Blah-blah.

The big polling firm YouGov reports regularly on how the British public is feeling about the Royals. Recently, it delivered the news that Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, gets a 49-per-cent approval rating among the 9,000 adults surveyed, and Catherine Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, has an approval rating of 64 per cent. The meaning extrapolated by a Royal-obsessed media from these figures is that people admire Kate’s “unflappable” nature.

The Crown (Season 3 streams on Netflix from Sunday, Nov. 17) is about the endlessly unflappable Queen, now played by Olivia Colman, and there’s an issue with the quality of the drama now. Being unflappable doesn’t make for terrific, gut-wrenching tension and twists. Thus, it’s the minor and fringe characters who carry the series in the new episodes.

Story continues below advertisement

This season covers the period from 1964 to 1977, the latter date being the Queen’s Silver Jubilee. From the start, there is an emphasis on the inevitability of change. The Queen is shown the new profiles of her that will be used on postage stamps and money. This plot device allows her to recognize that she’s not the youthful woman she was when she ascended to the throne. She’s not happy about it, and viewers will be reminded that we’re not watching the luminous Claire Foy any more.

The peculiar thing about The Crown now is that it’s neither up-market soap opera nor precise historical drama. The pressing matter of a young queen settling into her daunting role has passed. The family is also more at peace with the role imposed on it by tradition and societal need. What we’ve got now is a series of situations in which a traditional monarch must cope with both her private bewilderment at a Britain casting tradition aside in the 1960s and her management of her children’s lives.

Colman is very good, but at the same time her embrace of a remote figure, talking in a clipped, tense tone, presents us with a person less enthrallingly complex. It’s those around her who will grip the viewer. Further, the handling of historical events becomes less interesting than the coming-of-age of a few royal characters. You might long for more soap and less history.

In particular, the portrayal of the situation caused by the arrival of Harold Wilson’s Labour government is messy and rather trite. It’s made clear that some Royal Family members thought Labour was quasi-communist and spooked by him. It’s not clear enough, mind you, that Wilson (Jason Watkins) found the whole Royal thing tiresome and dangerous to democracy, a relic of the past worth forgetting.

The most gripping figure by far is Princess Margaret, now played by Helena Bonham Carter with a thrilling kind of zest. It’s like performance art, this particular turn, with Bonham Carter relishing the idea of occupying the mannerisms and snobberies of the most doomed and most posh of all the doomed, posh young women of the era. The series springs to life when she is featured.

The role of Prince Philip has been taken over by Tobias Menzies, previously best known for his intricately complex work as two figures in Outlander. He makes Philip’s neurotic self-absorption and melancholy almost relatable. The same cannot be said for Josh O’Connor’s Prince Charles, who seems less a prince than a dour schoolboy, even when he’s going into adulthood.

What becomes clear this season, based on what’s available in advance, is how difficult it can be to make these people terribly interesting. They are, after all, rather ordinary figures who happen to exist inside gilded cages. Every penny of the massive fortune Netflix spends on The Crown is certainly on display, though, and it never looks less than gorgeous. One suspects that the fourth season will have more gusto than this one, which never quite becomes the gut-wrenching drama it aims to be. It’s very focused on an unflappable central figure.

Story continues below advertisement

Television show The Crown might have won millions of fans across the globe with its dramatization of the life and reign of Britain's Queen Elizabeth and her family but one royal historian has accused it of peddling a subversive republican message. Reuters

Also airing this weekend

Independent Lens: Made in Boise (Sunday, most PBS stations, 10:30 p.m.) is about an unusual industry booming in Boise, Idaho. In this pleasant place, which sees itself as “an all-American city," nurses, nail technicians and stay-at-home mothers are choosing to become paid reproductive surrogates for people from around the world. The doc features four of them. As the existing child of one woman says, “My mom has babies for other people. It’s pretty cool, but weird at the same time.”

The Club (streams on Netflix from Friday) is a Mexican TV drama about a group of rich kids in Mexico City who make the mistake of creating their own ecstasy drug and figuring out how to sell it to their rich friends. This doesn’t go over well with established drug cartels. It’s an arch, lightweight thriller-drama with plenty of local flavour.

Live your best. We have a daily Life & Arts newsletter, providing you with our latest stories on health, travel, food and culture. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies