Skip to main content

Bombardier Transportation in Brazil was fined $7.9-million but it won't be barred from obtaining public contracts.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

Bombardier Inc. says it intends to appeal a Brazilian administrative tribunal ruling that concluded the railway car manufacturer and 10 other companies manipulated contract bids.

Brazil’s economic defence administrative council imposed fines of around $175-million against a “cartel” it found had manipulated at least 26 tenders between 1999 and 2013 in four Brazilian states.

“Bombardier strongly disagrees with this judgment, which is based on a partial reading of 1/8 the council’s 3/8 evidence in an administrative proceeding characterized by flagrant violations of constitutional principles, including the reasonable application of the law,” the company said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

France’s Alstom received the largest penalty of $43.8-million and lost the right to bid on rail contracts in the South American country for five years.

Bombardier Transportation in Brazil was fined $7.9-million. It could also be prevented from receiving public subsidies for five years, but won’t be barred from obtaining public contracts.

The case involving Bombardier concerned a Sao Paulo metro line and train car maintenance.

Despite being sanctioned abroad, the Quebec railway car manufacturer shouldn’t lose the right to bid on public contracts in Quebec and in the rest of Canada since it is not a criminal conviction, said Benjamin Lehaire, a professor of business law at TELUQ University in Quebec City.

“It will have no effect in Canada and Quebec,” he said Tuesday, referring to the administrative and not criminal nature of the decision. “Of course, this can alert the authorities, who may, after learning about these practices, investigate the actions in Canada of these companies.”

Under the Government of Canada’s Integrity Regime, a supplier may automatically lose the right to bid on public contracts following a criminal conviction.

However, there are certain provisions that allow the federal government to determine whether or not a business or individual should be blacklisted if offences committed abroad are considered sufficiently serious.

Story continues below advertisement

“I have trouble imagining that this could apply to Bombardier,” Mark Warner, a Canada-US trade lawyer with Maaw Law in Toronto, said in a phone interview.

Siemens was also targeted, but the German giant was not charged as it signed a confidential agreement with Brazilian authorities.

Public Services and Procurement Canada and the Quebec Public Procurement Authority didn’t respond to questions about the potential repercussions from the case in Brazil.

In Brazil, Bombardier remains under the scrutiny of the World Bank as part of an investigation into a contract of about $340-million awarded to a consortium led by Bombardier in 2013.

Related topics

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies