Skip to main content

In this Oct. 5, 2016, file photo, heavy equipment is seen at a site where sections of the Dakota Access pipeline were being buried near the town of St. Anthony, N.D.

Tom Stromme/The Canadian Press

A regulatory hearing to determine whether Dakota Access LLC can nearly double the flow of its oil pipeline through North Dakota began on Wednesday in the U.S. state, reigniting a fight with the nearby Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.

North Dakota Public Service Commission will decide at a later date whether owner Dakota Access LLC, controlled by Texas-based Energy Transfer LP, can build a pump station as part of an upgrade to boost pipeline capacity from 570,000 barrels aday (b/d) to 1.1 million b/d.

The industry sees the extra capacity as critical to handling expanding crude output from the Bakken shale play. But the Standing Rock Sioux, who live nearby, fear that spills could foul their drinking water and a sacred lake.

Story continues below advertisement

“The DAPL [Dakota Access Pipeline] capacity expansion will increase both the likelihood and the severity of spill incidents, and Dakota Access has failed to provide the commission with critical information necessary to properly evaluate the magnitude of those increased risks,” the tribe wrote in a Nov. 8 brief to the commission.

Standing Rock, which opposed the original construction of two-year-old DAPL, said greater velocity along the pipeline would increase the risk of spills.

The tribe was expected to address the commission directly on Wednesday at the hearing in Linton, North Dakota.

DAPL is a 1,886-kilometre underground pipeline carrying light oil from North Dakota through South Dakota and Iowa to an Illinois oil terminal.

A shale revolution has helped the United States become the world’s biggest crude oil producer, ahead of Saudi Arabia and Russia.

The North Dakota hearing follows an unrelated spill last month in the state of 9,000 barrels of oil from TC Energy Corp’s Keystone pipeline.

Dakota Access LLC, in a June written brief to the commission, said alternatively moving additional oil by truck is more dangerous than expanding the pipeline, and rail shipments are more costly.

Story continues below advertisement

Expanding the pipeline would allow Bakken producers to operate more economically and generate greater tax revenue for the state, said Ron Ness, president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, in a letter to the commission this week. Bakken production is expected to increase by up to 450,000 b/d in the next five years from 1.45 million b/d in August, 2019, he said.

Construction would take eight to 10 months, starting in spring 2020, Energy Transfer’s vice-president of engineering, Chuck Frey, told the commission.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies