Skip to main content

Mexican auto parts manufacturers with clients across North America expect a record year after U.S. approval of a trade deal mandating higher regional inputs, but the new rules pose a bigger challenge to car makers.

After months of wrangling, U.S. lawmakers on Thursday ratified the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), brokered at the behest of President Donald Trump to replace the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

The accord, which Canada’s parliament is expected to approve soon, requires automakers to use more local inputs for their cars to qualify for tariff-free trade within North America.

Story continues below advertisement

Over a period of years, automakers must gradually raise local content to 75% of a car’s value from 62.5%. During the transition to more regional parts production, car makers face the challenge of reorganizing supply lines.

Auto parts industry association INA pointed to news that three Chinese automakers were considering a move to Mexico as evidence of the lift USMCA should give.

“It’s really important, because this will help to boost the numbers in terms of auto parts output,” Alberto Bustamante, INA’s foreign trade chief, told Reuters.

Mexico’s economy has been on the brink of recession for the past year. Car sales, output and exports have all fallen and the industry expects them to drop again this year.

By contrast, the auto parts industry, including Mexico-based Rassini and Nemak and a wealth of foreign suppliers such as Goodyear and Pirelli, grew by 2.2% last year.

INA expects sales in 2020 to surpass $100 billion for the first time, rising to $102 billion from nearly $99 billion.

USMCA was designed to slow the car industry’s exodus from the United States and Canada by requiring 40% of a light vehicle and 45% of a pickup to come from “high wage” areas paying workers at least $16 an hour.

Story continues below advertisement

Another challenge for manufacturers: rules requiring use of North American steel and aluminum.

“It’s going to be hard work with our suppliers to meet the new rules, especially the steel and aluminum requirements and the labour content value,” said Miguel Elizalde, head of the Mexican association of heavy vehicle makers, ANPACT.

Manufacturers in Mexico are confident they can take advantage of the 55-60% of the market they are not priced out of.

Still, Kenneth Smith, Mexico’s lead trade negotiator from 2017-2018, said the new terms in the USMCA would be onerous for the industry across North America.

“It’s not good for Mexico, for the United States or Canada, because at the end of the day, specialized steels are going to become more expensive for the auto sector,” he told Reuters.

But after nearly three years of fraught discussions, Mexico could take comfort from the fact that the United States finally signed off the deal.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s very good news,” Smith said. “And it does give added certainty to investors and exporters.”

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies