Skip to main content

The Bathurst train station is seen in Bathurst, N.B., in a Feb. 24, 2017, file photo. Constables Mathieu Boudreau and Patrick Bulger are accused of five code of conduct violations after Michel Vienneau was shot in his vehicle outside the train station on Jan. 12, 2015.

Kevin Bissett/The Canadian Press

A New Brunswick arbitrator has 15 days to decide the fate of two Bathurst, N.B., police officers who were involved in a fatal shooting almost five years ago.

Constables Mathieu Boudreau and Patrick Bulger are accused of five code of conduct violations after Michel Vienneau was shot in his vehicle outside the Bathurst train station on Jan. 12, 2015.

“It has been a long journey and a lot of families have been torn asunder by what happened on that day,” Basile Chiasson, the lawyer for the Bathurst police chief, said after the end of closing arguments Monday in Fredericton. “There’s nothing to win here, because everything has been lost on that fateful morning.”

Story continues below advertisement

Police were acting on an erroneous Crime Stoppers tip that Vienneau, a 51-year-old businessman, and his common-law partner, Annick Basque, were transporting illegal drugs on a trip from Montreal.

In their effort to confront the couple, a police officer was pinned between a car and a snowbank and Vienneau was shot.

An investigation by the RCMP revealed that Vienneau was not involved in criminal activity.

During closing arguments, Chiasson said the two officers “acted in a hasty fashion” and were “trying to show their mettle” that day. He said they showed no good judgment or common sense as they tried to arrest two law-abiding citizens.

The police officers were conducting a plainclothes operation with unmarked vehicles, and he said it’s unclear if Vienneau knew Bulger and Boudreau were officers or believed they were “druggies or terrorists.”

T.J. Burke, the lawyer for Boudreau, acknowledged no drugs were found but questioned why an innocent man would not stop for police.

He said the officers did not have so-called “takedown jackets” with the word “police” on them. and lights and a public address system in their vehicle were not working properly. He said that was the fault of their employer.

Story continues below advertisement

Brian Munro, the lawyer for Bulger, said the two officers have been unfairly targeted for blame. He said senior officers did not question what the officers were wearing or the plan to confront the couple at the train station as they returned from a seeing a hockey game in Montreal.

He was critical of evidence given by Basque during the hearing when she was confused about which officer was driving the police car, and when she said she heard 30 to 60 gunshots fired. In fact, there were five shots.

“It all unfolded in a way we wish it had not unfolded,” he said. “If Mr. Vienneau had stopped, we wouldn’t be here.”

In total, the hearing heard from 13 witnesses over 10 days.

The decision will determine possible disciplinary action against the officers, which could include dismissal.

Last month, Vienneau’s family announced it is offering a $10,000 reward for information surrounding his death. In a Facebook post Nicolas Vienneau, Michel’s brother, says the police were acting on “bogus” Crime Stoppers tips.

Story continues below advertisement

It says the reward is for information leading to the arrest and prosecution of suspects surrounding Vienneau’s death.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies