Skip to main content

Steven Campbell is seen in an undated handout photo. Const. Abram Letkeman is to be sentenced for criminal negligence in his 2015 fatal shooting of Campbell.

HO/The Canadian Press

A former Mountie will not serve any jail time for his actions during a police chase that ended with the shooting death of a man in northern Manitoba.

Abram Letkeman, 37, was sentenced Friday for criminal negligence causing bodily harm for his driving before the 2015 death of Steven Campbell outside Thompson.

The former constable, who was given a medical discharge from the RCMP in December, was found guilty of the driving offences in August but acquitted of manslaughter and other shooting-related charges.

Story continues below advertisement

“I am torn,” said Justice Chris Martin. “On the one hand a short period of jail is in the range of a fit sentence but so too is a non-jail sanction.”

Justice Martin said in the end there would be no benefit to putting the former officer behind bars and sentenced Mr. Letkeman to three years probation, 240 hours of community service and fined him $10,000.

Mr. Campbell’s girlfriend, Lori Flett, was also shot and her pelvis was fractured in a collision with the officer’s cruiser.

In a statement read into court she described how Mr. Letkeman’s actions completely changed her life. Not only did Mr. Campbell – with whom she has a daughter – die, but her face is paralyzed on one side and she is deaf in one ear. She continues to struggle with mobility.

Mr. Campbell’s relatives told Mr. Letkeman in court that forgiveness was not an option.

“Steven would be alive today if you would have followed policy and not taken matters into your own hands,” said his father, Robert Campbell.

“Shame on you again. I pray this matter haunts you for the rest of your life as it does us.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Crown had been seeking three years behind bars.

The trial heard that Mr. Letkeman saw a Jeep early on a November morning as bars were closing in the community of about 15,000 people.

Mr. Letkeman testified he suspected the driver was impaired and attempted a traffic stop, but it drove away. A toxicology report later showed Mr. Campbell had alcohol in his system and was almost 2 1/2 times over the legal limit to drive. There was also a small amount of cocaine in his system.

There were four passengers in Mr. Campbell’s vehicle, including Ms. Flett.

Mr. Letkeman started to pursue the vehicle, but he did not communicate that to his supervisors.

The trial heard that Mr. Letkeman made the decision to use his cruiser to hit the back of the Jeep in order to stop it. A use-of-force expert testified the move was against protocol and training, and was extremely risky.

Story continues below advertisement

The Jeep kept moving and ended up on a trail for all-terrain vehicles. Mr. Letkeman followed in his cruiser and the Jeep lost control and stopped in some brush.

The trial heard Mr. Letkeman’s vehicle then T-boned it.

The officer testified he didn’t wait for backup and walked in front of the Jeep to do a high-risk takedown. He said the Jeep started moving toward him, so he was forced to fire. He also said his foot had been run over so he shot as fast as he could to save his own life.

Crown prosecutors argued that Mr. Letkeman had a history of unreasonable responses, in particular when it came to suspected impaired drivers.

They pointed to an incident in 2011, when he was reprimanded by the RCMP after chasing a vehicle at speeds up to 150 kilometres an hour while working in Alberta, despite being directed by superiors to discontinue.

They said he had a wanton and reckless disregard for the public, other passengers in the vehicle and Mr. Campbell.

Story continues below advertisement

Defence lawyer Josh Weinstein said Mr. Letkeman was a good officer who now suffers psychological effects from the traumatic shooting. Mr. Weinstein pointed to 120 letters of support submitted to court, many of which were from other officers.

He said his client has genuine remorse for what happened, but added that he was doing what he thought was right as a police officer.

Justice Martin said Mr. Letkeman’s driving decisions were unwarranted, dangerous and didn’t meet his training as an officer.

“It was truly lost on him that his judgment was wrong and there is good reason for rules and risk assessment that officers must follow,” Justice Martin said.

Mr. Letkeman, when given an opportunity to address court, told Mr. Campbell’s family he deeply regrets what happened and said he grieves the loss of their son every day.

“I know there is nothing I can say that will take away the pain.”

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies