Skip to main content

Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna during a press conference in Ottawa on June 25, 2019.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

The federal government and the provinces and territories say they have pieced together an “action plan” to gradually harmonize the recycling and reduction of plastic waste, with details yet to emerge.

Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said Thursday at a Halifax meeting of environment ministers that the governments agree there should be consistent standards and targets for companies that produce plastic waste or use it to package their products.

“For the first time, we now have this national zero plastic action plan to eliminate plastic waste. This is the first phase of it,” she said in a conference call during the lunch break.

Story continues below advertisement

She also told reporters that over time, the plan could ensure that companies are held responsible for managing and collecting their waste and paying the costs involved.

However, the document is written in very general language, with the earliest goals for achieving the various targets being December, 2020, and most extending to December, 2021.

Tensions also continued around the table between Ms. McKenna and ministers from conservative governments over the federal carbon tax.

Jeff Carr, New Brunswick’s Environment Minister, said after the meeting that he’d used the occasion to take Ms. McKenna to task over the use of carbon taxes being collected in his province.

Some of those funds are being sent back to the province to finance energy retrofitting of schools.

“New Brunswick can spend its own money on own energy efficiency priorities without the help of Justin Trudeau and Catherine McKenna,” Carr said during his closing remarks.

Ms. McKenna – who skipped the closing news conference – said too much time was wasted on these kinds of discussions during the meeting.

Story continues below advertisement

“Had New Brunswick stepped up, they would have been able to determine what to do with the carbon tax revenues,” she said during her conference call.

There were concerns before the meeting that the high level of antagonism between Ms. McKenna and conservative governments over the federal carbon tax might harm talks on other environmental issues.

Five of the provinces at the table are challenging or plan to challenge Ottawa in court over its “backstop” carbon tax, and a decision in Ontario’s case is coming Friday.

Last fall, the group was to meet in person in Ottawa to discuss plastic pollution, but that meeting was downgraded first to a video chat and then to just a phone call. While officials chalked it up to scheduling conflicts, behind the scenes it was said that the carbon-tax disagreement between Ottawa and many provinces was to blame.

Still, during that call, the provinces and Ottawa agreed to work toward cutting Canada’s waste in half by 2040 and trying to eliminate plastic as a source of garbage altogether.

Thursday’s action plan keeps that process going, said Nova Scotia Environment Minister Gordon Wilson, the host of the meeting.

Story continues below advertisement

He said the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment will keep working on the details and officials will bring back proposals, “for consideration at next year’s meeting.”

Much of the responsibility for plastics standards and producer responsibility lies with provincial governments.

Canada only recycles about 9 per cent of the plastic it produces. According to a recent report prepared for Environment Canada by Deloitte and ChemInfo Services, in 2016 Canadians threw out 3.3 million tonnes of plastic, 12 times more than was recycled.

“A nine per cent recycling rate is abysmal,” Ms. McKenna said ahead of the meeting.

There are a limited number of recycling facilities in Canada and a lack of standards for plastic packaging makes it difficult to recycle many items. Different dyes or glues used in labels can make recycling impossible, for example.

The Deloitte report also said it is still cheaper and easier to produce and use new plastic than it is to recycle and use recycled plastics. The report recommended setting standards to require packaging materials and other products to use a set amount of recycled material to create new demand that would propel expansion in the domestic recycling industry.

Story continues below advertisement

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced earlier this month that Canada was looking at banning a number of single-use plastic items within the next two years, including Styrofoam takeout containers, plastic straws and cutlery.

The products that will be banned won’t be determined until the Canadian Environmental Protection Act review process is completed.

But environment groups aren’t certain the provinces and Ottawa are getting a strong enough message about the need to reduce plastics.

A number of environment organizations rolled out “a plastic carpet” outside the ministers’ meeting Thursday, using some of the 113 kilograms of plastic waste collected in Halifax Harbour on a single day – June 15.

Sarah King, head of the oceans and plastic program at Greenpeace Canada, said there is not enough focus in provincial-federal talks about stopping the use of plastics altogether.

Mark Butler, the president of the Ecology Action Centre – Atlantic Canada’s largest environmental group – said: “Our message is work together. Put aside your differences and work together on plastics.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Canadian Press

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies