Wet snow falls as protesters demonstrate against the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline in Vancouver in January, 2013.DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press
The RCMP has been sitting for two years on a watchdog report into alleged Mountie surveillance of anti-oil protesters, a civil liberties group charges.
In a letter this month to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, a lawyer for the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association laments the “inordinate delay” that has effectively obstructed the report’s release.
The association lodged a complaint in February, 2014, with the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP. It alleged the national police force improperly collected and shared information about people and groups who peacefully opposed the planned Northern Gateway pipeline project and attended National Energy Board meetings.
The association said monitoring, surveillance and information sharing with other government agencies and the private sector created a chilling effect for those who might wish to take part in hearings or other public discussions on petroleum issues.
The commission launched a public interest investigation and completed an interim report into the matter in June, 2017, forwarding it to the RCMP for comment on the conclusions and recommendations.
The commission cannot prepare a final report until the RCMP commissioner responds, which also means the findings can’t be disclosed to the civil liberties association or the public.
In March, Paul Champ, a lawyer for the association, wrote commission chairwoman Michelaine Lahaie to express concern that more than five years had passed since the complaint was filed, saying the RCMP might have violated the fundamental freedoms of Canadians exercising their democratic rights.
B.C. civil liberties association to release CSIS papers on environmental groups
CSIS kept records on environmental groups, interacted with oil industry officials, files show
RCMP, intelligence agency accused of spying on pipeline opponents
“It is our view that this interminable delay undermines the credibility of the CRCC and, more importantly, calls into question its ability to fulfill its primary function: ensuring accountability of the RCMP and fostering public trust and confidence in Canada’s national police force,” Mr. Champ’s letter said.
“It is regrettable that the CRCC may not be treating this complaint with the seriousness it deserves.”
After receiving no reply, he followed up with another letter in May.
Nika Joncas-Bourget, the commission’s director and general counsel for reviews, told Mr. Champ in late May the watchdog shared his frustration with the Mounties.
“We can assure you that we have repeatedly expressed concern to the RCMP regarding the time it is taking to receive the Commissioner’s Response,” she wrote.
Ms. Joncas-Bourget said once the commission receives Ms. Lucki’s response, it will “promptly issue” a final report, something it usually does within 30 days of getting the top Mountie’s input.
The RCMP acknowledged Wednesday there is a delay in responding to interim reports from the commission, due in part to the number of reports and the volume of relevant material to be analyzed. “Efforts are currently under way to address this imbalance.”
Maintaining public trust and confidence is critical to providing an effective police service, said Carlene Variyan, a spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale, the cabinet member responsible for the RCMP.
“We expect that all parties involved in this investigation fulfill their obligations without undue delay.”
Meghan McDermott, a lawyer with the B.C Civil Liberties Association, holds a few redacted pages from the thousands disclosed by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service during a news conference in Vancouver, on July 8, 2019.DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press
In his Aug. 9 letter to Ms. Lucki, Mr. Champ noted the RCMP Act imposes a legal duty to provide a response to the commission’s interim report “as soon as feasible.”
“In short, the RCMP has been sitting on this report for over two years and effectively obstructing its release to my client and the public,” he wrote.
“It is our view that two years for your review and response to the CRCC’s interim report is clearly an unreasonable delay not contemplated by the statute, whether the delay is due to insufficient allocation of resources or any other cause.
“This delay is all the more serious when the allegations concern fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Canadian Constitution.”
The civil liberties association also complained in early 2014 about improper monitoring of anti-pipeline activists by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
The review committee that oversees CSIS dismissed the complaint in 2017, prompting the association to ask the Federal Court to revisit the outcome, a proceeding that is continuing.
Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.