Skip to main content

British Columbia Health Minister Adrian Dix, seen here Dec. 9, said the Delta Hospice Society, which operates the Irene Thomas Hospice in Ladner, may face penalties if it fails to make medically-assisted death available by the Thursday deadline.

DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press

A B.C. hospice society that refuses to provide medical assistance in dying at its facility in violation of local rules has been given until Thursday to submit plans for compliance.

Health Minister Adrian Dix said the Delta Hospice Society, which operates the Irene Thomas Hospice in Ladner, may face penalties if it fails to do so.

“We’ve asked them … to provide their plan to fulfill their contract with the Fraser Health Authority and it is our expectation that they will,” Mr. Dix said on Wednesday. “Should they not want to fulfill their contract with Fraser Health, there may well be consequences of that.”

Story continues below advertisement

Fraser Health’s policy on medical assistance in dying (MAID) sets out expectations for addressing a capable patient’s request for information about the end-of-life procedure, and connections to providers. Individuals and faith-based organizations can choose not to participate in medically assisted deaths, but still must facilitate connections.

The policy came into effect in September, 2016, and covers all facilities Fraser Health owns or operates.

The society’s founder and executive director, Nancy Macey, refused, saying that patients at the Irene Thomas Hospice who wanted MAID would have to be transferred to another facility. In September, 2019, the society’s board of directors dismissed Ms. Macey and voted to allow medically assisted dying. The decision to allow MAID was reversed after an annual general meeting in November in which proponents of performing the procedure were ousted from the board.

The hospice is not faith-based.

Fraser Health representatives met with hospice leaders on Dec. 5 “to discuss concerns we have regarding compliance with their contract,” spokeswoman Tasleem Juma said in a statement. “Fraser Health subsequently provided [the leadership] with formal notice of the concerns.”

According to the hospice’s most recent annual report, Fraser Health is by far its biggest funder, contributing about $1.5-million of $3-million for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018.

The Delta Hospice Society did not return a call requesting comment on Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Doug Mather, who was voted out as a director at the November annual general meeting, welcomed the news that Fraser Health appeared prepared to force the issue but said he wished it had happened sooner.

“As a board, we were hoping that at some point, Fraser Health as the major funder would force their [the hospice’s] hand, but they never did,” Mr. Mather said on Wednesday. “So now it sounds like they are finally weighing in.”

Mr. Mather said he and other former board members tried for two years leading up to the AGM to have the service provided at the hospice.

In an interview with The B.C. Catholic, a weekly newsletter posted online, in February, 2017, Ms. Macey said hospices should be able to opt out.

“Those who choose to have [medical assistance in dying] represent one per cent of the population,” she said. “The euthanasia people have choice anywhere they want it. Where does the choice come for the people who don’t want to be in an environment with euthanasia?”

Mr. Dix said the society is obligated to follow the rules while it receives public funds.

Story continues below advertisement

“And, of course, we do live in a free society,” the Health Minister said. “Delta Hospice Society can decide that it doesn’t want to continue to receive support from the Fraser Health Authority in its mission. They can choose to do that. You can absolutely have it your way. But you can’t have it both ways.”

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies