Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Public editor: With an allegation, names may not be needed

Emergency workers continue the search for victims Jan. 25, 2014, in L’Isle-Verte, Que., at the scene of a fatal fire at a seniors residence.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

The death of so many seniors at the home in L'Isle-Verte is an almost unimaginable tragedy for the entire community and, of course, all of the friends and family members of those who died or are missing.

Globe and Mail reporters have covered the story with sensitivity and included in the coverage have been tales of grief and heroism and stories urging government action.

One reader was unhappy with this story on the weekend. And this one from Saturday online. It referred to a rumour of smoking by one of the seniors, believed to have died, and how difficult that rumour was for his grieving family.

Story continues below advertisement

"Reporting that there are rumours is one thing. Digging deep into smoking habits, and feeding the rumours, is another. It's a horrible thing to do while freezing firefighters are recovering bodies," the reader said.

Reporters need to dig into possible reasons for a tragedy even while the recovery is going on. That is part of everyday journalism.

In the first story, a staff worker at the residence told reporters that he was 95 per cent sure the source of the fire was one of the resident's smoking. Then other media outlets found out the name of the senior and published it. That allegation and the senior's name were well known within the small community.

The weekend coverage was widespread and, in the midst of it, the senior's son came out of his home to talk with the media and gave a tearful interview.

Generally, this newspaper does not like using anonymous sources or not naming individuals, unless there are compelling reasons to do so.

Still, I think that there should have been a discussion about whether it was necessary to name the man, given that the story was based on an allegation. And I think "allegation" would have been a better word to describe the situation than "rumour."

Would anything have been lost by describing the senior and his son and not using their names? Would that make sense when the names were well known in that community? I know it goes against normal journalistic practices, but I think that there are times, such as with an allegation, when names may not be necessary. Of course, every instance has its own complexities, but taking a few minutes to discuss this would, in my mind, have been a good idea.

Story continues below advertisement

You can contact me at publiceditor@globeandmail.com or on Twitter @SylviaStead

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Public Editor

Sylvia Stead has been a reporter and editor at the Globe since 1975, after graduating from the University of Western Ontario in Journalism with a minor in Political Science. She won the Board of Governors Award there in 1974. As a reporter, Sylvia covered courts, education and Queen's Park. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.