Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Bad bill on prostitution – it’s law, until the Supremes return

A prostitute waits for customers along a road of the Bois de Boulogne in Paris August 28, 2013. A French parliament committee will review during the last week of November 2013 a proposal by the ruling Socialist party faction to scrap sanctions on soliciting and instead punish prostitutes' customers with fines. Parliament is expected to vote on the proposal in December 2013. Prostitution is not illegal in France, which has an estimated 18,000 to 20,000 sex workers according to a 2012 report by the Scelles Foundation, but there are laws against pimping, human trafficking and soliciting sex in public. Picture taken August 28, 2013. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann (FRANCE - Tags: POLITICS SOCIETY)


The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, enacted by Parliament on Tuesday, is an exercise in futility. The exploited persons in question – prostitutes – will not be more secure than they were. If anything, they may be less so.

Nearly a year ago, the Supreme Court struck down the three Criminal Code sections having to do with prostitution – prostitution itself never having been illegal – because the court concluded that the law amounted to a threat to the security of sex workers. It gave the government a year to draft a new law.

In response, Minister of Justice Peter MacKay mistakenly chose to make it a criminal act to purchase sex – a flip on the old laws, which made it difficult, albeit legal, to sell sex. But purchase and sale are not separable. And if the transaction becomes even more furtive than before, as the bill seems to intend, then prostitutes, who are overwhelmingly women, are very likely to be even more isolated and endangered. Which is precisely why the Supreme Court struck down the old laws.

Story continues below advertisement

The PCEPA makes it extremely difficult for anyone to advertise sexual services. A magazine or newspaper that includes an advertisement from a prostitute will be guilty of a crime. A person who helps a prostitute set up a website will be a criminal. And without prior communications by phone or Internet, it will be difficult for a prostitute to scrutinize potential customers and assess how dangerous they may be.

It is almost as if the government wanted to force prostitutes onto the streets, making them stand around, implicitly soliciting customers, and diminishing the quality of neighbourhoods – without protectors and without prospective witnesses to violence.

The Conservatives' now enacted bill, for all its faults, is at least a bill. The NDP and the Liberals offered only a few minor amendments, but they did not venture to commit themselves to any overall approach to the conundrums around prostitution.

The wheel needs to be reinvented. But all the federal parties have failed to put forward a new law that humanely balances the interests of society and with the real needs and fears of prostitutes so clearly articulated by the Supreme Court. Once this bill becomes law, it will find itself back in court.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct Licensing Options
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles as we switch to a new provider. We are behind schedule, but we are still working hard to bring you a new commenting system as soon as possible. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to