Skip to main content

I recently bought four all-season tires for my Pontiac Grand AM. Two of the tires are marked as manufactured on "1815" and the other two "4614," The garage tells me they are still good. I have my doubts, especially on the 2014 dates. Should I return them? – Thomas

For those new to reading tire dates, the last four digits of a tire's DOT number denote the week and year of production. In this case, 4614 indicates that this tire was manufactured during the 46th week of 2014.

There are no specific laws regarding a tire's age and when it should be taken out of service. However, six years from production date is a common guideline tire retailers use to steer their customers into a new set of tires.

Story continues below advertisement

A tire can outlive its projected six-year life span and is quite common when affixed to a vehicle that sees limited yearly mileage. Is it safe? Who knows? Think of a rubber band that has been sitting around for years and breaks when stretched even slightly.

In my own business, I occasionally make a purchasing error and get stuck with unsold inventory. I depreciate those tires based on six years' worth of life from their production dates. So a new, unsold tire from 2014 would be discounted by approximately 50 per cent of its original value.

Thomas, if you just paid full retail for these tires, I think your "garage" got the better end of the deal.

Lou Trottier is owner-operator of All About Imports in Mississauga. Have a question about maintenance and repair? E-mail globedrive@globeandmail.com, placing "Lou's Garage" in the subject area.

Shopping for a new car? Check out the new Globe Drive Build and Price Tool to see the latest discounts, rebates and rates on new cars, trucks and SUVs. Click here to get your price.

We travel to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in Virginia to see a Subaru slam into a barrier and learn what makes it safe for the driver
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies