Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Acura's new crossover at least $6,000 less than German rivals

2013 Acura RDX


Overall Rating
Quality is a real calling card for the RDX, that and value. You get plenty of SUV for the money. You’ll like this vehicle if: you want a conservative, $40,000-something SUV that won’t break and is friendly to operate.
Looks Rating
Acura’s designers have chosen to err on the side of inoffensive and they’ve been successful. The RDX is pleasant enough to view, but it hardly stands from the crowd.
Interior Rating
The RDX has more room inside than, say, a BMW X3 and its shows. No adult, front and back, lacks decent room. The cargo area is big and functional and the instruments and controls are dummy-proof.
Ride Rating
The RDX rides like a normal mid-size near-luxury sedan. The engine is strong, the steering tight but not too much so, and the comfort level at highway speeds is decent enough. But this is not a particularly fun-to-drive rig.
Safety Rating
A Top Safety Pick and, of course, loaded with safety features.
Green Rating
Fuel economy is okay, but nothing special, and premium fuel is recommended.

Quality? It has never been an issue for Acura. Design? Now you're on to something.

Greg, a Globe Drive reader and car connoisseur, put it this way: "The horrid styling. The headliner is the ridiculous chrome beak they've bolted on all models. This is backed up by all the nasty diagonal creases and cut lines all over the cars' butts."

Well, Greg, Acura has toned down the styling in recent models, the RDX crossover being one of them. Where Acura had obsessed on going all technical and wacky in the designs, now we're seeing a move to conservative styling.

Story continues below advertisement

All this has occurred while Acura's quality has remained top-drawer. The most recent J.D. Power and Associates Initial Quality Study (IQS) saw Acura ranked sixth, while in J.D. Power's long-term Vehicle Dependability Study, Acura was eighth. Consumer Reports ranks Acura seventh for reliability and the RDX itself was the runner-up in the entry premium crossover SUV class, behind the Infiniti EX.

Breakdowns? No, and there's a similar safety story. The U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety rates the RDX a Top Safety Pick because it nails all the crash tests, has "good" headrest protection in rear-enders and it comes with all sorts of useful driving nannies to keep you out of a crash.

For all that, the previous-generation RDX was a disappointment. Most buyers here want comfort, timeless styling and easy-to-use technology; Acura came on with RDX styling that offended the Gregs of the world. On top of that, Acura's engineers tuned the RDX for quick handling to the point of over-responsiveness. Jittery and jumpy, in fact.

For the 2013 remake of the RDX (which arrived last year), Acura turned things around entirely. This newest rig is conservative in design and comfy in terms of ride comfort. All the technology is modern enough and there's plenty of it (Bluetooth and SMS text messaging is standard).

And where the old RDX was jeered for the jerkiness of its turbocharged four-banger, the new RDX has a 3.5-litre V-6 engine (273 horsepower) that is pretty darn efficient (10.7 litres/100 km in the city, 7.3 on the highway). Alas, it does slurp down pricier premium fuel. Regular would be better.

Let's give credit where it's due, however. This redesigned RDX crossover has a longer wheelbase and wider track than the outgoing 2012 RDX. As a result, the Acura has more headroom, legroom, shoulder room and cargo space than the rival BMW X3 – which also starts at $42,450.

Except you get a lot more in the starter RDX than you do in the base X3. For instance, a garage door transmitter is standard on the Acura, extra on the BMW; leather seats are standard on the RDX, extra on the Bimmer. Parking aid and a power sunroof are all part of the basic RDX package – and extra on the X3. In fact, if you want an X1 equipped like an RDX, you'll need to spend another $8,000-plus.

Story continues below advertisement

You'll find a similar story when you match the RDX head-to-head against the Mercedes-Benz GLK 350. Equip the Acura and the Merc uniformly and whammo – you're into the German rig for another $7,000 or so. On the other hand, when matched against the much less powerful Audi Q5 (211 hp from a turbo four), the Audi has about a $600 advantage, uniformly equipped. Ah, but take the Q5 with its V-6 and all of a sudden that net advantage for the German turns into a $6,000 disadvantage.

Acura's product planners, of course, have done this exercise. They know they can whip their German rivals on pricing and they also have an edge on quality. The Marysville, Ohio, plant where the RDX is built (along with the Acura TL and Honda Accord) is a Silver Award winner in J.D. Power's quality rankings. Vehicles from that plant suffer an average of just 26 problems per 100 vehicles. In other words, three out of four Marysville vehicles are problem-free in the first 90 days of ownership.

My tester RDX had the standard all-wheel-drive, heated leather seats and, with the Tech Package, was priced at $43,990. The extras included voice-activated navigation, an eight-inch LED display and a 410-watt surround sound with 15 gigabyte music storage and a useful power tailgate. All RDX models get a six-speed automatic transmission geared for quick acceleration in the first five gears, and freeway cruising in sixth.

Greg, our design critic, also should appreciate how Acura's designers cleaned up and simplified the cabin and its controls. Absurdly redundant controls have been idiot-proofed without any loss of functionality. The instrument panel, too, is smartly laid out. Throughout the cabin, Acura's designers have focused on installing richer-looking and -feeling materials. The interior is roomy and a handle release in the cargo area sends the seatback down to a flat position.

So with the weirdness of the old RDX is gone, Acura is hoping Greg and his ilk will take another look. They should.

Tech specs

Story continues below advertisement

2013 Acura RDX

Type: Entry premium crossover

Price: $40,990 (freight $1,945)

Engine: 3.5-litre V-6

Horsepower/torque: 273 hp/251 lb-ft

Transmission: Six-speed automatic

Drive: All-wheel

Fuel economy (litres/100 km): 10.7 city/7.3 highway; premium gas

Alternatives: Land Rover LR2, Audi Q5, Mercedes-Benz GLK 350, BMW X3, Lexus RX, Volvo XC60, Cadillac SRX, Lincoln MKX

Report an error
About the Author
Senior writer, Globe Drive

In 25 years of covering the auto industry, Jeremy Cato has won more than two-dozen awards, including three times being named automotive journalist of the year. Jeremy was born in Montreal and grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at