Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Moody’s lambastes dealer’s $78-million executive incentive plan

An employee of the Korea Exchange Bank counts money next to stacks of one hundred U.S. dollar banknotes at the bank's headquarters in Seoul, Aug. 11, 2011.

JO YONG-HAK/REUTERS

Enrichment of corporate executives through high compensation is one of the big negatives of owning stocks. The hired help try to help themselves to too much of the wealth businesses create.

It isn't often that you'll see a high level denunciation of extreme corporate compensation. But Moody's Investors Service has done just that, over a payday for two executives at Jefferies Group, the mid-sized U.S. investment dealer that is about to merge with Leucadia National Corp.

Moody's analyst Peter Nerby has taken a swipe at the $78-million (U.S.) incentive plan compensation to CEO Richard Handler and Brian Friedman, chairman of the firm's executive committee.

Story continues below advertisement

In Moody's weekly credit outlook, Mr. Nerby called the payment, in the form of restricted stock, a "credit negative" for bond holders and said it "once again highlights the issue of excessive compensation at investment banks."

Mr. Nerby, while praising the performance of Jefferies in avoiding some of the huge losses experienced by bigger rivals, says the size and form of the award to the executives "may jeopardize the board's stated objective of 'motivating employees to perform without exposing the company to serious risk.'"

It's a refreshing take by Moody's. Most shareholders are used to reading self-serving justifications for huge pay packages in annual shareholder circulars, where these types of stock awards are praised as a way of aligning the interests of executives with those of owners.

Another take is that the stock awards may have the opposite effect: encouraging executives to take gambles that harm shareholders who actually use real money to buy their stock.

Mr. Nerby, for one, worries about it. Although the Jefferies stock award is subject to three-year vesting, "history has shown that tail risks can take longer than three years to appear," he noted.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Investment Reporter

Martin Mittelstaedt has had a varied reporting career at the Globe and Mail, covering politics, the environment and business. He opened up the Globe's New York bureau for the Report on Business, and has also been on the banking and capital markets beats. He's written extensively on investing themes. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.