Skip to main content

Paul Beattie is the CEO of BT Global Growth. He is also a contributor to Capital Ideas Digest, a weekly compilation of investment ideas based on a variety of research reports. The Globe and Mail provides marketing services and receives compensation from its parent company, Capital Ideas Research. Try it now to get a special one month free offer, and the free daily Morning Need to Know e-mail.

In my 30 years of investing, I have never experienced a situation like this.

It may be a first: a Canadian-listed precious metals company has started producing at a mine, without a Bay Street research report having ever been written about it.

Story continues below advertisement

Red Eagle Mining (R-T) is commissioning its Colombian operation, the San Ramon Gold mine. It's pouring gold as we speak – it announced on Nov. 7 that it had poured its first gold at the mine in Antioquia, Colombia – but Bay Street hasn't noticed and doesn't seem to care. I think analysts will eventually have to pay attention to Red Eagle, if for no other reason than it just graduated to the Toronto Stock Exchange from the Venture Exchange. (In fairness, I understand some analyst reports on Red Eagle may finally be in the works.)

The Narcos effect

The reason there is little to no interest in Red Eagle is that too many financial professionals watch the show Narcos. I'm not joking. Many of their opinions and attitudes toward Colombia are shaped by the Netflix series, which examines the infamous Medellin drug cartel run by the notorious Pablo Escobar, and the Drug Enforcement Agency officials who were trying to track him down.

So, in other words, there's scant attention paid to Red Eagle in 2016 because of a television show set in the 1980s. In addition, investment managers also have an aversion to Colombia because it's not perceived to be mining friendly. It's only in recent years that the government has started to allow new mining projects after decades of restrictions.

The Spanish empire left a lot of gold behind

The truth is, if you're in the gold business, it's probably a good idea to go where the gold is. The Spanish empire mined gold from what is now Colombia for nearly 300 years. Given they couldn't build mines deeper than 20 metres, we think it's a good bet they left some of the yellow metal behind.

My team and I at BT Global Growth are also prepared to bet that Bay Street is going to go from ignoring to adoring Colombian mining opportunities.

Story continues below advertisement

The case for Red Eagle

We've met Red Eagle's operational management team and visited the construction site in Colombia. The chief operating officer, Bob Bell, and his team are impressive, having brought this project forward on schedule and on budget.

They tell us production of 70,000 ounces are doable for 2017 at cash costs of below $600 (U.S.) an ounce. Red Eagle benefits from a low Colombian peso, low labour costs, and reasonable energy expenses.

The operation should be able to achieve $1-million (U.S.) in earnings per week before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).

Red Eagle CEO Ian Slater says the company will likely have a tax rate in Colombia in the low 30s in terms of percentage. The company will also pay the government of Colombia a royalty rate of 3.2 per cent of revenue.

"The cheapest gold stock in the world"

Story continues below advertisement

Red Eagle has a market cap of about $197-million (Canadian) and $60-million (U.S.) in term debt, which puts the enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EV/EBITDA) ratio at four times. This compares to mid-cap listed gold companies at seven-to-eight times, and the big players, like Barrick Gold, at 12-times plus.

Red Eagle also owns 92 per cent of CB Gold Inc. (CB-V) which has a market value of about $57-million. Deduct that and Red Eagle's EV/EBITDA drops to about three times. This is simply too cheap to ignore.

Like any miner, Red Eagle is not without risk. One of our concerns is the quality of the company's ore grades. But recently, two new drilling results were issued and the grades look to be much better than the mine plan of 5.2 grams per tonne. It appears management has been conservative in their assumptions.

It's not complicated

Most mining analysts in Canada have warned us that opening a new mine is complicated, risky, difficult and so on, and we agree. But when we spoke to the specialists who are building the Red Eagle plant, including the mining construction company Peru-based Stracon GyM, which owns an equity stake in the company, we got the picture the mine is not as complicated as it seems.

Quick turnaround time

Story continues below advertisement

There are similar operations to Red Eagle's all over Mexico, Peru and Ecuador and they all seem to work. The timeline at San Ramon between extracting ore and producing gold bars is only a matter of days, not months. That led us to the conclusion that this management team is highly likely to deliver.

There have been hiccups along the way to production for Red Eagle such as a transport workers strike, and there will probably be more, but they'll likely get resolved. That's because the entire operation was designed with redundancy in mind. It actually has capacity for twice the expected annual production. There is basically two of everything on site.

Will Bay Street take notice?

Here is our investment thesis on Red Eagle Mining through two scenarios: Bay Street wakes up, turns off Narcos, and realizes that the company is the first new, cash-flowing, gold producer in the centre of Colombia, a country that is sure to yield more exciting projects.

Or, the San Ramon Gold Mine will not live up to expectations.

I'm betting on the first scenario.

Story continues below advertisement

Full disclosure: The BT Global Growth Fund and its management team own shares in Red Eagle Mining, and have been advisors to the company's management team.

Special to The Globe and Mail

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter