Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Western opposition to Potash sale complicates PM's decision

The Calgary skyline is shown on Sept. 9, 2010.

chris bolin The Globe and Mail

Growing opposition in Western Canada to a foreign bid for Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan is complicating what will be one of the biggest decisions Stephen Harper has ever made regarding this country's business sector: whether to hand outsiders a vital asset.

Most of the antipathy toward Australia-based BHP Billiton's $38.5-billion (U.S.) offer for Potash Corp. - on which Ottawa will render judgment Wednesday - has been centred in the fertilizer giant's home province of Saskatchewan and led by Premier Brad Wall.

But a new opposition front has emerged over the past few weeks in Mr. Harper's political backyard of Calgary, traditionally a stronghold of free markets and heavily dependent on foreign investment for oil and gas development.

Story continues below advertisement

Some Alberta business leaders have spoken up, while others are pressing MPs to take their message to Mr. Harper. Senior Tories say the Calgary concerns have made a decision on Potash more difficult.

Richard Haskayne, a veteran of Canadian boardrooms who's headed several of this country's biggest companies, is one Calgary businessman who's been lobbying Tory ministers to reject the takeover.

Mr. Haskayne, a former chairman of MacMillan Bloedel and Nova Corp., says a green light for BHP to take over Potash would be wrenching for Canada, given that four premiers oppose the deal.

"It's going to be as divisive as the NEP," Mr. Haskayne said, referring to the interventionist 1980 national energy program that infuriated Albertans.

Only a few days ago, BHP seemed confident it had satisfied Ottawa's "net benefit" test for foreign takeovers, paving the way for the deal to go through.

But lately the deal has apparently given Mr. Harper pause for thought.

In October, the Prime Minister tried to play down the significance of the BHP buyout offer, calling it merely "a proposal for an American-controlled company to be taken over by an Australian-controlled company."

Story continues below advertisement

On Tuesday, however, Mr. Harper sounded very different in the Commons, saying the deal will not be "rubberstamped" as he alleged such takeovers were by previous Liberal governments.

As the debate over the BHP offer played out, Potash Corp. was transformed in the public eye from a relatively arcane business venture into a symbol of national pride. The debate galvanized public support for keeping it Canadian, and three other premiers joined Mr. Wall in opposition to the bid.

Regardless of the outcome, the decision will be a defining moment for Mr. Harper, who's spent years trying to cultivate a reputation as a champion of foreign investment.

Opposition to the deal has risen even among Calgary oil and gas leaders who don't think Potash will affect their business.

"My vote is against it, just on a business sense," said Scott Saxberg, the chief executive officer of Crescent Point Energy.

But, he added, blocking a potash deal is very different than blocking an oil and gas deal. Allowing BHP to buy Potash could affect the global price for potash, he said, since it would give BHP control of such a vast percentage of global output.

Story continues below advertisement





Roger Gibbins, Calgary-based executive director of the influential Canada West Foundation, said there is a lot of wariness among oil executives - concerns he shares - because Canada's widely held companies can be as vulnerable as Potash Corp. to a foreign takeover. He said the country loses a lot when it loses head offices, including corporate engagement in communities and career opportunities.

Mr. Gibbins said the federal decision will send a major signal to the global marketplace.

"If it goes through, it sends the signal that we're open for business in a very big way," he said. "And if it doesn't, then it's a new ballgame [for foreign investment]with no clear rules."



















































With a report from Shawn McCarthy

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Authors
Parliamentary reporter

Steven Chase has covered federal politics in Ottawa for The Globe since mid-2001, arriving there a few months before 9/11. He previously worked in the paper's Vancouver and Calgary bureaus. Prior to that, he reported on Alberta politics for the Calgary Herald and the Calgary Sun, and on national issues for Alberta Report. More

Asia Bureau Chief

Nathan VanderKlippe is the Asia correspondent for The Globe and Mail. He was previously a print and television correspondent in Western Canada based in Calgary, Vancouver and Yellowknife, where he covered the energy industry, aboriginal issues and Canada’s north.He is the recipient of a National Magazine Award and a Best in Business award from the Society of American Business Editors and Writers. More

Contributor

Brenda Bouw is a freelance writer and editor based in Vancouver. She has more than 20 years of experience as a business reporter, including at The Globe and Mail, The Canadian Press, the Financial Post and was executive producer at BNN (formerly ROBTv). Brenda was also part of the Globe and Mail reporting team that won the 2010 National Newspaper Award for business journalism. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.