Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Less is more? Why I’m finished with big, foamy running shoes

In the aisles of neon, foam, Technicolored laces and the oxymoron of something called barefoot footwear, I am completely lost. Normally, I love shoe shopping, but this is a torturous exercise in information overload.

With five weeks to go before the half-marathon, I'm running longer and more often than ever before and my inner knees are decidedly unhappy. I've been training with my two-year-old New Balance 890 shoes, which have big, cushy "stabilizing" soles, and are unbelievably ugly: bright orange and green foam with rainbow chunks. I call them Skittle vomit – but I thought they were helping.

My angry knees disagreed.

Story continues below advertisement

Last week, physiotherapist Greg Lehman recommended I get new shoes to change how my body absorbs shock. He told me to rotate the bodily stresses of running by switching up my footwear, and insisted I call Blaise Dubois, "the running-shoe guy in Canada."

Dubois is indeed serious about shoes: The Quebec City physiotherapist started the Running Clinic 10 years ago, consults Canadian athletes on biomechanics and knows just about every shoe on the market. He's developed a complex rating system that measures every shoe – the better they mimic a natural run, the better the score.

From the second he answers the phone, I'm all ears. "Imagine a 300-pound man," he says. "You'd say there's no way for that man to run softly. But get him barefoot, and get him on gravel – he'll run softly." His point is clear. The big imaginary man wouldn't strike the ground hard because it would hurt. But if his foot was swaddled in a giant foam container, he'd heel strike – what most of us do in traditional shoes, Dubois says – and the stress would be transferred to his knees and hips.

Foamy shoes change the way we run, Dubois says, and in the process, can cause injuries elsewhere. They're great for protecting the foot when it's injured – like a cast for a broken arm – but not continuously, when running pain-free. They're also good for people who are content with their current performance, and have no desire to improve.

Unlike some sport stores, his clinic isn't influenced by corporate interests, he says.

Reviews of recommended shoes – about 300 across four categories – are incredibly thorough (down to the millimetre of "stack" – the difference of height from heel to toe).

After our talk, and an hour spent on his website scanning recommended "transition" shoes, I am well-equipped to select the right shoe for my needs – or so I thought as I walked into the Overwhelming Shoe Store.

Story continues below advertisement

The sales guy watched me walk down an aisle, and said instantly, "You need a stabilizing shoe." I don't want a stabilizing shoe, I told him. I'm trying to land softer, put less stress on my knee and hip joints, and develop the muscles in my ankles and feet. "Why don't you try something like this," he said, lifting an astronautic apparatus that was more foam than shoe.

I'll stabilize you in a minute, I thought. I asked to try three pairs that are minimal but also supportive. I can't tell much from walking around the store, so I take them home to test drive on my condo treadmill.

The Nike Free 5.0 feels a little too free. My ankles show their weakness, and ache almost instantly. The Saucony Mirage 4 has too much flat cushion on the bottom, and it feels like running on a pretty inflexible, dense foam pad.

My week of shoe mayhem ends when I lace up the Nike Flyknit Lunar2 – a ridiculous name for a beautifully simple shoe. I don't have to think about running with better form. It just happens, the ground meets my mid-foot as I bounce along with smaller strides. If there ever was a thing as running for true pleasure – this is it. I'm in love.

At $200 before tax, of course they're the most expensive pair.

They feel so good, in fact, I ignore Dubois's giant caveat: Transition slowly. He had told me I should dedicate only 10 minutes of my next run in new shoes, and add a minute to every run after that. Instead, I go full tilt for an hour. My feet and ankles ache a few hours later, irritated at losing their cushioned bubbles.

Story continues below advertisement

Baby steps, I know. For now, more with just a little less is my new mantra.

Follow me on Twitter: @amberlym and tweet running advice with #globeruns

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Editor in the Opinion section

Amberly McAteer is an editor in the Opinion section at The Globe and Mail. She has been a homepage editor, online editor and community editor in Features - including Life, Travel, Style, Arts and Books. She's written columns about her quest to run a 10K and find the perfect dog. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at