Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Can you tell when someone is lying to you?

Stock photo | Thinkstock/Stock photo | Thinkstock

As any fan of the television show Sherlock knows, part of the fun is watching a protagonist who can spot a liar a mile away. That's because, despite what we tell ourselves, we're actually pretty easily duped.

According to a new study from the University of British Columbia, it may be our smugness that's blinding us to deception: The people who think they should be the best at catching a lie are actually the worst.

In the study, published in the journal Legal and Criminological Psychology, researchers gave the 116 participants a standard questionnaire on emotional intelligence, a measurement of a person's ability to assess and manage emotions in themselves and other people.

Story continues below advertisement

Then they were shown 20 videos of people pleading for the safe return of kidnapped family members. (Half of the time, the person making the plea had been found to be responsible for the missing loved one's disappearance.) Researchers asked the participants to evaluate whether the pleas were honest, their confidence in their assessment, and what they based it on.

The participants who scored the highest on EQ scale – those who demonstrated better skills when it came to perceiving emotions – were the most likely to have assume the liars were being honest.

Stephen Porter, director for the Centre for the Advancement of Psychological Science and Law, told Science Daily that basically people became overconfident, and assumed truth where it didn't exist.

Part of lab's research explores how to better train police and other authorities to watch for liars in their facial movements and word use, by coding television footage of murderers making disingenuous pleas for help.

For instance, here's how not to be deceived: Liars speak more slowly, with more "ums" and "ahs," and often use few hand and arm movements. Deceptive murderers were more likely to express disgust than sadness, if only in brief facial expressions. They used more tentative language, as if suggesting that the victim "may" not be found, so they don't have to commit to the lie, while genuine family members are more likely to address the victim directly.

The best tip, however, may be not to assume you have someone all figured out.

Elementary, Dr. Watson.

Story continues below advertisement

Think you would know a lie when you hear one?

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author

Erin Anderssen writes about mental health, social policy and family issues. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.