Skip to main content

The Biggest Loser contestants: Amanda Kramer and Aubrey Cheney.

Handout

We've all watched morbidly obese contestants battle it out every week on the Biggest Loser, competing to lose the most weight. They heave through competitions, resist junk food temptation and sweat more on national TV than any person should. The transformation is always stunning and heartwarming: They leave healthier, more active, living life to its fullest. Regardless of whether they won the game, they won a second chance.

(That we watch the sweat-a-thon from our comfortable couches on Sunday night is another story, but I digress.)

Now the show – and the doctors involved – have come under fire for a recent decision to include a new demographic: children.

Story continues below advertisement

The pediatrician involved, Dr Joanne Dolgoff, says the show "did a lot of research to make sure that this was handled the right way. And I give them a lot of credit because they are not exploiting the children. It's all about addressing an issue that needs to be addressed, and you know, they've gone about it entirely the right way."

But Dr Yoni Freedhoff, a doctor in obesity medicine in Ottawa, has blasted the show and Dr. Dolgoff, for not following the Hippocratic oath to do no harm.

He says the show's success rate of long-term weight loss is incredibly low – with a high guess of 33 per cent – and attacks the decision to include children (there will be three this season – two 13-year-olds and a 16-year-old.)

The doctor writes, "I shudder to think of the taunts, pressure and pain that the show's children will face as this season progresses, let alone if they, like the vast majority of the show's contestants, regain once it's done."

"I'd posit that simply being on the Biggest Loser puts these kids, regardless of their short and long term weight loss outcomes, at incredible risk of harm," Dr Freedhoff writes in his blog, "due to the pressures of simply being so completely in the public's eye, an eye which isn't kind to adults, let alone the public eye of young teenagers."

I don't see the show as being cruel or unkind to its contestants – but given the prominence of bullying, is this a good idea?

Would children be inspired or ridiculed for their weight loss efforts?

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Editor in the Opinion section

Amberly McAteer is an editor in the Opinion section at The Globe and Mail. She has been a homepage editor, online editor and community editor in Features - including Life, Travel, Style, Arts and Books. She's written columns about her quest to run a 10K and find the perfect dog. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.