Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Anti-polygamy law compared to former prohibition on homosexuality

Winston Blackmore, the religious leader of the polygamous community of Bountiful, B.C., receives a kiss from one of his daughters as a son and a grandchild look on April 21, 2008 near Creston, B.C.

Jonathan Hayward/ The Canadian Press/Jonathan Hayward/ The Canadian Press

Canada's anti-polygamy law is akin to the long-abandoned criminal prohibition on homosexuality, fuelling social stigma while forcing people in honest, committed relationships to live in shame, says a lawyer arguing the law should be struck down.

George Macintosh said removing polygamy from the Criminal Code would have the same positive effect as the decriminalization of homosexuality in 1969.

"In this sense, [the anti-polygamy law]is precisely the same as the law against homosexual sex, which was struck down in Canada 42 years ago," Mr. Macintosh said Tuesday during his final arguments at a landmark B.C. court case.

Story continues below advertisement

"Only then could gays and lesbians begin to live a life with dignity."

Both sides of the case have cited the history of gay rights and same-sex marriage to argue their points. At least one group supporting the law has said the same-sex marriage debate settled questions surrounding the definition of marriage. Challengers, including Mr. Macintosh, have said court cases linked to gay rights opened to door to change that definition further.

The provincial and federal governments have argued polygamy is inherently bad, pointing to alleged abuses in the small commune of Bountiful, B.C., as proof.

But Mr. Macintosh said the law, as it's currently worded, doesn't appear concerned with harm.

Instead, it turns anyone in a relationship involving more than two people into a criminal, regardless of whether that relationship is harmful.

"The criminalization of polygamy is perpetuating prejudice and perpetuating stereotyping," he said. "The criminalization of polygamy has been used to target groups that are already disadvantaged. The clearest examples are fundamentalist Mormons and aboriginal persons."

Residents of Bountiful are members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which, unlike the mainstream Mormon church, still practises polygamy. The failed prosecution of two men from the community led to the current constitutional case.

Story continues below advertisement

The court has also heard evidence of polygamous Muslims and historic cases involving aboriginals. The only polygamy conviction in Canadian history was a case in 1899 involving a native man in the Northwest Territories. Another conviction under the law in 1906 involved a man who committed adultery.

The governments have argued polygamy - specifically polygamy involving men with multiple wives - inevitably leads to sexual and physical abuse, child brides, teen pregnancies and human trafficking.

But all of those problems are already crimes elsewhere in the Criminal Code, said Mr. Macintosh, and the polygamy law does nothing to address them. Furthermore, he said, the polygamy law may also target women with multiple husbands, as well as same-sex polygamous unions, which haven't been linked to those same harms.

Mr. Macintosh said the law violates several sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, including those involving freedom of religion and discrimination based on marital status.

He also argued the polygamy law is an unfair intrusion into the sexual lives of consenting adults.

"The law has generally not punished adultery, despite the enormous costs it can entail. Nor does the law prohibit group sex or swinging if it is done in private," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

"But it is criminal for them to form a conjugal union."

The case has focused largely on life in Bountiful, where the community's two competing bishops briefly faced polygamy charges in 2009.

Winston Blackmore and James Oler were each charged with having multiple wives, but the charges were thrown out by a judge later that year.

The constitutional case has heard that Mr. Blackmore has as many as 25 wives, while Mr. Oler has at least five.

The Canadian Press

Report an error
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.