Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Environmentalists, industry tussle over proposed increase in B.C. coal exports

A battle over proposed new coal ports in the states of Washington and Oregon has spread into British Columbia, raising fears industry could miss out on a booming market in Asia.

In a public letter released Wednesday, nearly 200 prominent climate scientists, academics and environmental groups asked the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority to delay expansion plans that would make it the largest exporter of coal in North America.

The letter asks for projects at Fraser Surrey Docks, in Surrey, and at Neptune Terminals, in North Vancouver, to be halted to allow for greater public involvement. And it calls for "explicit consideration of the global climate change impacts" related to exporting coal that could be burned to produce electricity.

Story continues below advertisement

"These proposals are not in the best interest of Canadians, nor anyone else. They will … hasten the onset of dangerous climate change, which poses a clear threat to human health and well-being," states the letter.

The document is signed by authors such as Bill McKibben and Naomi Klein, academics Mark Jaccard and Andrew Weaver, among others, and dozens of organizations including Greenpeace Canada, the Wilderness Committee, Earthjustice and the Rainforest Action Network.

The Canadian signatories are adding their voices to a growing environmental protest in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, where concerns have been raised about climate change, coal-dust pollution and increased rail traffic associated with proposed port expansion.

The movement to constrain coal ports comes as the industry is pushing for greater transportation infrastructure to support the shipment of millions of additional tons of coal yearly to surging markets in Asia.

Ann Marie Hann, President of the Coal Association of Canada, said opposition to the Vancouver port projects is misguided because most of the coal shipped from B.C. is metallurgical, which is used to make steel, not thermal, which is burned to produce electricity.

She said delays could cost industry an opportunity to cash in on market demands and that would hurt Canada economically.

"You are preventing jobs from being created, you are preventing additional royalties being paid to the government … and you know there is a small window for Canada to potentially take advantage of the growing opportunities in Asia," she said. "If there is undue delay, then that window could very easily close on the Canadian industry."

Story continues below advertisement

But Eric de Place, a senior researcher with the Sightline Institute, a Seattle think tank, said while B.C. ports have historically shipped mostly metallurgical coal, the expansions would allow for large volumes of thermal coal to be handled from U.S. mines.

"It's natural the debate would expand into Canada now that Port Vancouver is beginning to consider expanding to start handling some of this U.S. coal headed for Asia," he said. "The world's biggest coal reserves are located in the American heartland. The world's biggest consumer base is in East Asia – and the road between those two leads to the Pacific Northwest, to Oregon, Washington and British Columbia."

Joe Foy, a director of the Wilderness Committee, said the proposed expansion in B.C. would allow for an additional 14 million metric tons of coal to be exported from Vancouver.

He said that would include low-grade thermal coal from the U.S. and argued the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority cannot avoid addressing the issue of climate change.

"They are players in this game. They cannot wash their hands of it because the fact is coal is a huge polluter of our climate. I don't think they can dodge that," said Mr. Foy.

Port officials could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
National correspondent

Mark Hume is a National Correspondent for The Globe and Mail, based in Vancouver, writing news and feature stories on a daily basis about his home province of British Columbia. His weekly column, which often challenges the orthodoxy on environmental issues, appears every Monday. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at