Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Out-of-town investors inflate real-estate prices and rent, study finds

Condo towers in downtown Vancouver, B.C.

Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press

Investors who buy housing and leave it empty in a city push up both real estate and rent costs, making older homeowners more wealthy and renters significantly worse off, concludes a new study by a pair of professors from Vancouver and New York.

Crunching data from Statistics Canada and the census, as well as historical New York data, the researchers found a 10-per-cent increase in out-of-town investors produces a 9-per-cent increase in rents in the central city and a 5-per-cent increase in house prices in the region.

The city ends up worse off because the negatives for some groups are higher than the positives for others, University of British Columbia professor Jack Favilukis said.

Story continues below advertisement

"The effect on the losers" – renters and younger homeowners – "outweighs the effect for winners, the older homeowners," he said.

His study appears as Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson pitched a move this week to require developers to market their condos to local residents first. That's the latest effort from the city to grapple with soaring real estate and rent costs – frequently blamed on offshore buyers – on top of plans to restrict short-term vacation rentals and a new tax on vacant housing.

Mr. Robertson's motion on the "locals first" presales passed, meaning staff will explore mechanisms for such a requirement. But it can be imposed only on new condo projects that are going through a rezoning, which gives the city some leverage to negotiate conditions.

The mayor acknowledged that the presales initiative will not reduce prices, but added it will improve access for local residents.

Prof. Favilukis said the two main ways for the city to counter the negative effects are to increase supply or impose a tax on out-of-town investors that can be used to improve the situation for those who get hit with the negative effects.

Prof. Favilukis and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, a professor at the New York University Stern School of Business, described Vancouver and New York as "two poster children of the [out-of-town] investor debate" that prompted them to develop their model of investor impact.

The effects are especially noticeable in central cores.

Story continues below advertisement

Those buyers "make [the central city] higher-income and higher-wealth, accelerating gentrification," the paper concludes.

Prof. Favilukis specified that the investors who were the subject of the paper's attention were any people who live outside the metropolitan area and do not participate in the local economy.

That means they leave their residence empty for most or all of the time or have family members living there, but the primary money-earner is elsewhere, not paying income tax locally.

These people could be anywhere, including China, the United States or Ontario. He said investors who buy a property but rent it out to locals do not affect property prices or rents the way out-of-town investors do by leaving units empty.

He also noted that out-of-town investors have some positive effects on the economy, creating jobs and increasing wages as workers shift to higher-paid construction.

Prof. Favilukis said there are two approaches to reducing the negative impact.

Story continues below advertisement

"The best response would be to increase supply," he says.

The study's model assumes supply does not keep up with demand when the 10-per-cent wave of investors arrives, based on what happened historically, he said.

But if it is not possible to increase supply enough, a city can turn to some form of tax to mitigate the negative impact.

Prof. Favilukis said Vancouver's vacancy tax, which non-resident homeowners will have to pay for the first time next year, is a decent effort.

However, he said, the recently instituted 15-per-cent tax on property sales to foreign buyers is "not great."

"It misses anyone who has bought in the last 15 years. Anyone already taking up space doesn't pay this tax."

Instead, he said a proposal for a tax based on local income that a group of UBC and Simon Fraser University professors made last year would be better.

That proposal suggested applying a high property tax on all homeowners, which would be reduced if they could demonstrate they were earning local income and paying local taxes.

Offshore investors who rent out their properties would get the reduction.

Carrick Talks Money: Do high rents mean it's better to buy a house? (The Globe and Mail)
Report an error
About the Author
Urban affairs contributor

Frances Bula has written about urban issues and city politics in B.C.’s Vancouver region, covering everything from Downtown Eastside drug addiction to billion-dollar development projects, since 1994. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨