Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Report sparks debate over Site C land use if B.C. mega-dam rejected

A model of the proposed Stie C dam at the Community Consultation Office in Fort St. John on January 16, 2013.

Deborah Baic/The Globe and Mail

The panel assessing issues around the proposed $7.9-billion Site C hydroelectric dam in Northern British Columbia says thousands of hectares of land bought up for the project should be released if governments decide against the project.

Releasing the land could create future challenges for reviving Site C – a project that has lingered for decades and twice been rejected by the B.C. Utilities Commission.

The land would likely have to be expropriated again should a future government revive the project. BC Hydro is arguing the project is a necessity for meeting surging provincial energy needs in decades to come. Both the federal and provincial governments have six months to decide whether to approve Site C – the third in a series of dams on the Peace River.

Story continues below advertisement

The Joint Review Panel struck by the governments of B.C. and Canada said, as one of its recommendations in a long-awaited report released this week, that if the project does not proceed, the province should allow other uses for the land intended for flooding in a manner that preserves the agricultural, wildlife and heritage values of the Peace River valley after consultation with affected parties.

Asked about the panel recommendation on releasing the flood reserve, B.C. Energy Ministry spokesperson Matt Gordon said in an e-mail exchange that releasing the land would be a consideration after a government decision.

BC Hydro has bought a total of 3,068 hectares for the project since the 1970s of which 667 hectares would be flooded, the utility said Friday through a spokesperson. However, a total of 5,000 hectares of land would be flooded for the project – about 81 per cent owned by the Crown and the rest currently privately owned.

Farmer Ken Boon is pleased at the particular recommendation, which he says sums up an issue raised by landowners, environmentalists and First Nations who appeared before hearings held by the panel.

"That would mean the end [for the foreseeable future] of the project and that was what we were arguing for, and they have accepted that," Mr. Boon said in an interview Friday.

Mr. Boon said the Peace River valley is essentially being kept in a time capsule because the prospect of Site C has prevented development by landowners and others.

If some future government begins reassembling land, he said that future process "would be a lot nastier than using the land they have now," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Environmentalist Andrea Morrison of the Peace Valley Environmental Association said Site C has cast a shadow of farmers, who would like expand their crops in the region but have held off because they didn't know whether their efforts would be submerged by the project.

The panel report says a total of 34 farms would suffer effects including the loss of land and farm infrastructure, but overall B.C. or western Canadian production wouldn't be harmed. Ms. Morrison and her group dispute that point. "The panel was wrong," said Ms. Morrison, a resident of Fort St. John, a city near the project.

But one regional leader said the report has left many seeking clarity. "The recommendations that came out are not a yes; they're not a no. It's 'If this, then this,'" said Lori Ackerman, the mayor of Fort St. John. "Those who are looking for the positives in it, that it moves forward, are certainly seeing that, and those [hoping] that it not move forward are seeing that as well."

A report from a joint review panel released Thursday urged provincial and federal governments to consider 50 recommendations if they decide to proceed with the Site C hydroelectric megaproject on the Peace River in northern B.C.

Still, it will take several more months for the final decision to be made. Do you support the project? Cast your vote below or click here.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
B.C. reporter

Ian Bailey is a Vancouver-based reporter for The Globe and Mail.  He covers politics and general news. Prior to arriving at The Globe and Mail, he reported from Toronto and St. John’s for The Canadian Press.  He has also covered British Columbia for CP, The National Post and The Province. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.