Skip to main content

I'm often asked if multiculturalism and bilingualism can co-exist. My default answer is "Why not? Pourquoi pas?" Multiculturalism does not exist in a vacuum in Canada. It is built on a pre-existing bilingual framework that still frames the content of the Canadian character.

Most Europeans who arrived in the peak years of immigration to Canada had the notion of preserving their mother tongue quickly drummed out of them by social pressure and the school system. They were forced, in other words, into a unilingual understanding of what it meant to be a Canadian.

Multiculturalism served, in many ways, as the celebration of newfound respect for the cultural heritages of non-British, non-French immigrant groups. But, having preached the virtues of multiculturalism for a generation, as a country we have failed to recognize the virtues of appreciating the importance of the notion of bilingualism.

Story continues below advertisement

Bilingualism is not a romantic idea, it is a purposeful and powerful one. It's obvious that, in a North American context, the English language will trump all others, especially as English becomes a global Esperanto. But if what makes Canada truly distinct are its Anglo-French roots and its bilingual national character, then we should take the initiative to make sure that Canadians – no matter what their cultural heritage – are able to appreciate and communicate in our two official languages.

It's not just a question of building a better citizen; it's also a matter of making sure that there is a more equitable representation in our political institutions.

Why is it that we have so few representatives of non-British, non-French immigrant groups in the halls of power in Canada? As a country of immigrants, we have failed to ensure that every Canadian has the means and the ability to exercise a political voice that requires bilingualism and the kind of political understanding that is opened up through a knowledge of both languages.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter