Skip to main content

A Metrolinx LRV is shown being built in Thunder Bay in this recent handout photo.

HO/THE CANADIAN PRESS

A sole-sourced deal for $528-billion worth of transit vehicles, pitched by the Ontario government as an elegant solution that would offer certainty two Toronto rail lines would open on time, is facing a flurry of criticism from competitors who warn it breaks the rules.

The purchase of 61 light-rail vehicles from Alstom SA was presented by Transportation Minister Steven Del Duca as a way to offer insurance in the event that Bombardier Inc. wasn't able to follow through on its commitments to produce LRVs. He defended the decision not to put the contract out for bids, saying that this was acceptable in an emergency.

But Bombardier disputes that argument.

Story continues below advertisement

"There is no emergency," Bombardier spokesman Marc-Andre Lefebvre said from Edmonton Wednesday. "When you look at the facts … we are entirely on schedule."

And Siemens AG, which had been hoping for some LRV business in Toronto, made it clear privately that the firm was bitterly unhappy.

"This decision effectively eliminates Siemens from competition for future light-rail car procurement in Ontario, causing us irreparable harm," Robert Hardt, the CEO of Siemens Canada, wrote in a letter to Mr. Del Duca dated May 24. The letter, which was not publicly released, was first reported by the Toronto Star.

The Ontario government said it had to order from Alstom after losing confidence in Bombardier's ability to produce vehicles for light-rail lines along Eglinton and Finch avenues in Toronto.

"The purchase of Alstom vehicles is a necessary contingency plan to address the emergency created by Bombardier's failure to perform and deliver," Celso Pereira, a spokesman for Mr. Del Duca, said in a statement. "Alstom is already in production in Ontario and their trains have passed all of the engineering requirements."

If Bombardier does come through with the LRVs it has promised, the Alstom vehicles will be used instead for transit projects in Mississauga. Either way, this would appear to give Alstom a competitive advantage for any future LRV needs.

The short letter from Siemens' Mr. Hardt goes on to argue that buying from Alstom "appears to extend a pattern" of non-competitive procurement, is "inconsistent" with provisions in CETA, the recently signed trade deal between Canada and Europe, and "may well be a factor in upcoming NAFTA negotiations."

Story continues below advertisement

Trade expert Lawrence Herman noted that CETA isn't yet fully in force, so can't be legally invoked, and that the part dealing with procurement could allow "limited cases" of sole sourcing.

"Nonetheless, the CETA principles governing procurement are that they be non-discriminatory as between treaty parties, with full transparency and an open bidding process," he said in an email. "So Siemens might have a legitimate point. Whether there is the basis for a legal claim against the Ontario government is another matter."

This is the second time in recent years that Alstom has secured a substantial sole-source contract in the Toronto market. The TTC decided in 2015 to shift gears on a major signalling project and bring in Alstom, giving them the $562-million contract without putting it out to tender.

Agency officials now call that a decision necessary to getting the project back on track. When Alstom was also awarded the Ontario LRV contract, transit observers noted that they seemed to be carving out a lucrative niche as a company that is given the deal when a competitor is perceived to be struggling.

But other firms refuse to take this lying down, though it remains unclear how combative they are willing to be in order to protect their chance at the Ontario market.

In his letter, Mr. Hardt says that the company is "exploring all options," without specifying how far it could go. A spokeswoman for the firm declined to elaborate Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Likewise, Bombardier's Mr. Lefebvre was unwilling to give details about how far Bombardier might go to protect its chance to bid on future projects.

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this story said the Alstom vehicles will be used for transit projects in Mississauga and Hamilton if Bombardier doesn't follow through on its commitments. In fact, Hamilton is still proceeding with vehicle procurement and it’s not clear which vehicles the city will receive.
The Toronto Transit Commission is investing in signalling upgrades that will hopefully see them able to run subway trains closer together.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter