Skip to main content

This essay by storyteller, poet and author Lenore Keeshig was originally published by The Globe and Mail on January 26, 1990.

"AAA-IIII-EEE Y-AAh! Clear the way. In a sacred manner I come. The stories are mine!" - Ojibway war song

Critics of non-native writers who borrow from the native experience have been dismissed as advocates of censorship and accused of trying to shackle artistic imagination, but their objections are prompted by something much more.

Story continues below advertisement

Where The Spirit Lives may be a bad film. Bone Bird by Calgary novelist Darlene Barry Quaife may oversimplify native spirituality. W. P. Kinsella's Hobbema stories may be insulting. But the real problem is that they amount to culture theft, the theft of voice.

Opinion: The cultural appropriation debate is over. It's time for action

Canada's francophones have a strong and unique voice in North America. Why? Because they have fought to ensure that their language remains intact. Language is the conveyor of culture. It carries the ideas by which a nation defines itself as a people. It gives voice to a nation's stories, its mythos.

How do Canadians feel about the U.S. mythos defining them and their country? This is quickly becoming a reality, I fear, because Canadians have been too quick to hand over their voice and their stories to Americans.

Stories, you see, are not just entertainment. Stories are power. They reflect the deepest, the most intimate perceptions, relationships and attitudes of a people. Stories show how a people, a culture, thinks. Such wonderful offerings are seldom reproduced by outsiders.

This is the root of the problem with Where The Spirit Lives, which deals with the treatment of native students in government-sponsored residential schools during the 1930s. The film has been shown on the CBC and TVOntario and as part of Canada Day at the recent festival in Palm Springs, Calif.

So what is it all about, anyway? In the end, a little Indian girl and her brother ride off into the vast, uninhabited wilderness (Anne Shirley goes west?). They ride right out of the sentimentalized Canadian consciousness – stoic child warriors noble in defeat, marching home with Bible in hand. (A book of truth, perhaps, but whose?) Native people were not involved in any creative aspect of the film. Their voice was heard only through cultural consultants hired to provide the nuances and insights lacked by the movie's writer and producers. Cultural insight, nuance, metaphor and symbols give a book or film the ring of truth, but their essence – the thing that gives stories universal appeal, that allows true empathy and shared emotion – is missing from Where The Spirit Lives, as it is from most "native" writing by non– natives.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadians all too often use native stories, symbols and history to sell things – cars, tobacco or movies. But why hasn't Basil Johnston's Indian School Days become a bestseller? Why hasn't Half Breed by Maria Campbell been reprinted? (Why, for that matter, has Ms. Campbell, as one of Canada's "celebrated" authors, never received a writer's grant?). Where The Spirit Lives, after having squeezed out the native version of what happened in the residential schools, turns around and tells natives to make their own movies. How can we? Even if we had access to financial backers, they would say: "Residential schools? It's been done."

With native people struggling for justice with land claims and in education, what makes Canadians think they have equality in the film industry? In publishing? With agencies that make arts grants? In the arts themselves?

Instead, the Canadian cultural industry is stealing – unconsciously, perhaps, but with the same devastating results – native stories as surely as the missionaries stole our religion and the politicians stole our land and the residential schools stole our language. As Leslie Marmon Silko writes in Ceremony, stories are all we have, you see – all we have to fight off illness and death." AS A STORYTELLER I was once advised by an elder that there is a season for storytelling – winter. "Blackflies, mosquitoes and other creatures like those stories," she cautioned.

How quaint, I thought. Nonetheless, I respected her advice and, as time went on, I began to understand it. If storytellers sit around all summer telling stories, then surely they'll become the feast of blackflies and mosquitoes. My elder was telling me that these stories are meant for certain ears only – and native ears.

So potent are stories that, in native culture, one storyteller cannot tell another's story without permission.

But why are Canadians so obsessed with native stories anyway? Why the urge to "write Indian?" Have Canadians run out of stories of their own? Or are their renderings just nostalgia for a simpler, more "at one with nature" stage of human development? There's a clich for you.

Story continues below advertisement

Maybe Canadian stories about native people are some form of exorcism. Are they trying to atone for the horrible reality of native-Canadian relations? Or maybe they just know a good story when they find one and are willing to take it, without permission, just as archeologists used to rob our graves for museums.

What about the quest for native spirituality? It is mostly escapist, and people such as Ms Quaife would rather look to an ideal native living in never-never land than confront the reality of what being native means in Canadian society.

For example, residential-school survivors tell of children being forced to eat their own vomit when their stomachs could no longer hold down the sour porridge. They tell of broken knuckles from fingers being rapped. Some even tell of having pins stuck through their tongues as punishment for speaking their own language. (Now, that's censorship.) And what about the teacher who was removed from one residential school for abusing children? He was simply sent to another, more remote school.

It's not that these stories have never been told; Canadians just haven't heard them. Nor does it mean our writers and storytellers are incompetent and inexperienced, as Mr. Kinsella seems to suggest.

It means our voices have been marginalized. Imagine, Canadians telling native stories because because their government outlawed native languages, native culture.

However, as Ms Campbell said on CBC Radio's Morningside, "If you want to write our stories, then be prepared to live with us." And not just for a few months.

Hear the voices of the wilderness. Be there with the Lubicon, the Innu. Be there with the Teme-Augama Anishnabai on the Red Squirrel Road. The Saugeen Ojibway. If you want these stories, fight for them. I dare you.

Video: Opinion: What is cultural appropriation? (The Globe and Mail)
Report an error
Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨