Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Four Lac-Mégantic issues that still need to be resolved

Wagons of the train wreck are seen in Lac Megantic, July 9, 2013.


A lawsuit and other legal battles. The final Transportation Safety Board report. Insurance rules. New tank cars. Kim Mackrael looks at other issues as criminal charges are filed.

Ongoing legal battles

Peter Flowers, a lawyer who represents 41 families affected by the tragedy in a lawsuit against MM&A railway and other companies, said he views the criminal charges as good news. "But it's really a first step. There are other parties that need to be held responsible," he said, pointing to oil companies and rail-car manufacturers as two examples. A separate class-action lawsuit was also filed in Canada last year.

Story continues below advertisement

In addition, the province of Quebec ordered MM&A, Canadian Pacific, and three oil companies to pay for the clean-up work related to the accident. The companies contested the order, and the matter is now before a Quebec tribunal. Clean-up and decontamination costs have been estimated at $200-million.

Transportation Safety Board investigation

The TSB is preparing a final investigation report that will look in detail at how the accident in Lac-Mégantic occurred and may provide additional recommendations for avoiding similar incidents. The agency has already released several interim recommendations during the past year, prompting new federal rules for emergency response planning and tank car construction, among others. A spokesperson for the TSB said on Tuesday that the investigation is now in its final phase, which involves writing and producing its report on the accident.

Insurance rules

After the derailment in Lac-Mégantic, the federal government announced that it would require shippers and railways to carry more insurance to deal with major accidents. MM&A did not have enough insurance to deal with the costs of the disaster in Lac-Mégantic, which will likely run into the billions of dollars when lawsuits and the clean-up effort are taken into account. (MM&A filed for bankruptcy protection from its creditors last year and its assets have since been sold to another U.S.-based company). The Federation of Canadian Municipalities has advocated for a pooled insurance system that could be drawn upon in the event of another similar disaster.

Tank cars

Federal Transport Minister Lisa Raitt announced new rules last month affecting the kinds of tanker cars that can be used to carry crude oil and other dangerous goods by rail. Older-model DOT-111 tank cars, which are commonly used to carry crude in North America, have been criticized for years as prone to puncture and corrosion. Within the next three years, industry will no longer be permitted to use the older-model tank cars to carry dangerous goods through Canada by rail.

Story continues below advertisement

The United States Transportation Department recently sent proposals on tank car standards to the White House, but new regulations are not expected to come into force in the U.S. before the end of this year.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Parliamentary reporter

Kim Mackrael has been a reporter for The Globe and Mail since 2011. She joined the Ottawa bureau Sept. 2012. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at