Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

New research on Franklin expedition casts doubt on lead-poisoning theory

A watercolour painting shows ships from the second Franklin search expedition locked in ice, listed to its side, wintering in Barrow Strait, 1850-1851.

GEORGE FREDERICK McDOUGALL/LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA

Scottish scientists are challenging more than two decades of speculation about the fate of the doomed Franklin expedition with new research that suggests lead may not have been the primary undoing of Sir John Franklin and his crew.

In a paper published in the British journal Polar Record, Keith Millar and Adrian Bowman of the University of New Glasgow and archaeologist William Battersby of London say the levels of lead in bodies recovered from the 1845 voyage may have been normal for the British population of the day and that a proportion of the crew would likely have suffered little, if any, impairment.

That contradicts the accepted wisdom of the past 23 years. In 1990, Canadian researchers said the tests of bone and tissue from the corpses of 18 expedition members provided indisputable proof that the explorers were suffering from chronic lead poisoning. The source of the contaminant was said to be the tins of soup, vegetables and meat that were part of the ships' provisions.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Millar, a professor of medical psychology, said Wednesday in a telephone interview that there is no doubt the levels of lead found in the remains of the crew were high relative to those in the average person today. But "in Britain in the 19th century, lead poisoning was not uncommon," Dr. Millar said. "Water was often provided through lead pipes, from lead storage tanks, there was a lot of atmospheric lead, there was a lot of lead in food and so on. So the fact that high levels of lead were found in these sailors in the Arctic, we don't know whether that would have been any different to lead in the British population as a whole."

The fate of the Franklin expedition has been a source of mystery and speculation since the ships – the Erebus and the Terror – disappeared during the quest for the Northwest Passage. Canadian researchers have said there is no doubt that the Franklin's crew would have been suffering both psychologically and neurologically from lead poisoning.

But Dr. Millar and his colleagues say the progress that the expedition made before the ships were abandoned in 1848 suggests lead may not have been as disabling as previously thought.

The bodies of three of Franklin's men who died six months into the voyage on Beechey Island contained significant amounts of lead, which can produce severe colic, constipation, a loss of kidney function and serious psychiatric and intellectual impairment.

But the expedition continued on for 2 1/2 more years. If lead had been a real problem, Dr. Millar said, "it would have been quite impossible, really, for the expedition to have gone on from Beechey Island to head southwest to the Canadian mainland, which is what they did, simply because they wouldn't have had the effective manpower to operate the ships."

John Geiger, co-author of the best-selling booth Frozen in Time – The Fate of the Franklin Expedition and the executive director of the Royal Canadian Geographical Society, pointed out that the new study accepts that lead was likely a contributing factor in the fate of the expedition.

Mr. Geiger said he has personally seen the lead solder in the seams of the cans left by Franklin and his men and it would have posed a significant health risk. "There has never been any doubt in my mind that it was a combination of factors," Mr. Geiger said, "of which lead was one."

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Parliamentary reporter

Gloria Galloway has been a journalist for almost 30 years. She worked at the Windsor Star, the Hamilton Spectator, the National Post, the Canadian Press and a number of small newspapers before being hired by The Globe and Mail as deputy national editor in 2001. Gloria returned to reporting two years later and joined the Ottawa bureau in 2004. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨