Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Federal departments refuse to tell watchdog how they’re cutting budgets

The Peace Tower and a Canadian flag are seen on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, April 27, 2011.


Federal departments have rebuffed yet another attempt by the Parliamentary Budget Officer to obtain details on budget cuts announced nearly 16 months ago.

The interim PBO, Sonia L'Heureux, issued a statement Monday indicating that numerous federal departments have ignored a July 19 deadline she had set for them to hand over requested information on cuts announced in the 2012 budget.

The statement opens the door for NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair – who asked the PBO to gather the information – to take government departments to Federal Court.

Story continues below advertisement

NDP finance critic Peggy Nash described the government's position as "an outrageous disregard for accountability" and said her party is considering all of its options, including the possibility of going to court.

"People deserve to know how their tax dollars are being spent and that's all we're asking for," she said.

The list of departments that have ignored the PBO's requests includes the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Finance Canada, National Defence and Statistics Canada. The March, 2012, budget said federal spending would be cut permanently by $3.1-billion this year, rising to more than $5.1-billion in continuing cuts starting next year. The 498-page budget book listed total cuts by department, but did not provide details on how services would be affected.

According to the PBO, the departments are claiming that details on spending cuts are not "financial or economic data" as defined in the legislation that created the PBO's mandate.

In April, Federal Court Justice Sean Harrington dismissed a case brought by the PBO and Mr. Mulcair on a technicality – that the PBO had not asked the departments to provide the information on behalf of Mr. Mulcair.

However, the court suggested that if the request was filed appropriately, the government would have to comply.

"Parliament has no right to ignore its own legislation," the court ruled.

Story continues below advertisement

Shortly after the decision, Ms. L'Heureux sent new requests to federal departments on behalf of Mr. Mulcair. She noted on July 3 that they were still refusing to provide information and set a new deadline of July 19.

Ms. L'Heureux is the head of the Library of Parliament, which oversees the PBO. She has been the interim head of the PBO since March, when the five-year term of the first PBO, Kevin Page, expired.

There has been considerable secrecy surrounding the process to replace Mr. Page. Critics have also questioned why two senior government officials were included on a panel to select the next PBO, given that the position serves Parliament, not the government.

Mr. Page recently told The Globe and Mail that the process has failed and should be restarted with a truly independent hiring panel.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Parliamentary reporter

A member of the Parliamentary Press Gallery since 1999, Bill Curry worked for The Hill Times and the National Post prior to joining The Globe in Feb. 2005. Originally from North Bay, Ont., Bill reports on a wide range of topics on Parliament Hill, with a focus on finance. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at