Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Feds launch '11th-hour' bid to keep Ontario pimping law in place

Left to right sex worker advocate Terri-Jean Bedford raises her arms in victory during a press conference in Toronto, Ont. Monday, March 26, 2012. Ontario,ÄöaÑa¥s top court has legalized brothels in a ruling that came out today.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail/Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

The federal government has asked the Supreme Court of Canada to put the brakes on the impending decriminalization of a key law that would permit a form of living off the avails of prostitution.

A 30-day stay the Ontario Court of Appeal imposed last month when it rewrote the law's pimping provision will end within days unless the Supreme Court intervenes.

In its landmark decision, a five-judge panel of the provincial appeals court was also unanimous in removing prohibitions on keeping a brothel – a measure that takes effect in 11 months. The court said that it is senseless to have a law that compels prostitutes to work in dangerous isolation given that prostitution itself is legal. It granted prostitutes the right to set up brothels and hire staff to protect them.

Story continues below advertisement

It allowed the Crown one victory in the constitutional challenge of the law, ruling in a 3-2 split that communicating for the purposes of prostitution will remain illegal.

The landmark decision is binding on Ontario courts and sets up a final showdown at the Supreme Court of Canada next fall or in early 2013.

The expiration of the 30-day delay on the revision of the pimping provision to target only those who live off the avails of prostitution "in circumstances of exploitation" imparted a sense of urgency to the government's formal request for leave to appeal the ruling.

Prosecutor Michael Morris raised the spectre of neighbourhoods being frequented by prostitutes and their bodyguards. He said that the impending "regulatory void" will permit prostitutes, bodyguards, drivers and booking agents to go about their business openly.

"If the stay is not extended, the public interest, communities and neighbourhoods and the proper administration of justice will suffer irreparable harm," Mr. Morris said. "It does so without affording any opportunity for the various levels of government to legislate in response to address the consequences and prevent any resulting harms."

However, a lawyer for the three sex workers behind the constitutional challenge of the prostitution law's provisions accused the government of sitting on its hands since the Ontario decision was rendered on March 28.

In documents filed at the Supreme Court, lawyer Alan Young said that the government's "11th-hour request" has made it virtually impossible for his clients to provide a meaningful response, cross-examine Crown experts or provide evidence to support their arguments.

Story continues below advertisement

"It is submitted that this late request also puts this Honourable Court in the difficult position of making a decision, even a temporary one, on the basis of a fragmented and potentially misleading record," said Prof. Young, who teaches law at York University's Osgoode Hall Law School.

The Ontario Court of Appeal concluded that the brothel and pimping laws combine to create grave dangers for prostitutes. They reasoned that they prevent prostitutes from congregating in the safety of a brothel or hiring staff to protect them from dangerous clients.

Prof. Young emphasized that any delays in executing the Ontario decision will add to the dangers that the court found prostitutes face.

He also said that the ruling does not prevent police from acting to stop violent or exploitive pimps or prevent human smuggling or underage prostitution.

Addressing the overall need for the Supreme Court to hear the case, Mr. Morris said it raises a matter of national importance. He said that the Ontario judgment represented, "a fundamental shift in criminal law and social policy."

By deciding what aspects of the prostitution laws are or are not constitutional, Mr. Morris said, the litigation goes to the heart of Parliament's ability to create and enforce laws dealing with complex social problems.

Story continues below advertisement

He also warned that the prostitution laws will be applied inconsistently from one province to another if the Supreme Court does not act to clear up the confusion.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Justice reporter

Born in Montreal, Aug. 3, 1954. BA (Journalism) Ryerson, 1979. Previously covered environment beat, Queen's Park. Toronto courts bureau from 1981-85. Justice beat from 1985 - present. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at