Skip to main content

Politics Feds push pause on peacekeeping decision amid Trump uncertainty

Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan speaks to reporters at a Liberal cabinet retreat in Calgary on Jan. 23, 2017.

Jeff McIntosh/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Liberal government has pushed pause on its plan to deploy peacekeepers to Africa, as it seeks to get a better handle on what the Trump administration's arrival means for Canada's defence priorities.

The government announced in August that Canada would deploy up to 600 troops on future UN peacekeeping missions, though it stopped short of saying exactly where they would go.

That decision was promised by the end of the year, after military officials and Canadian diplomats had a chance to test the waters and get a better sense of where the troops could make a difference.

Story continues below advertisement

But ministers opted not to make a decision last month and their plans to deal with the question at this week's cabinet meeting in Calgary have again been scuttled.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan has refused to reveal the reason for the delay, but sources say the government wants a better sense of the Trump administration's expectations before making a decision.

Sajjan spoke to new U.S. Defence Secretary James Mattis by telephone on Monday and while they did not discuss peacekeeping, Sajjan says he intends to do so when the two meet in person for the first time.

"It's all interconnected," Sajjan told reporters in Calgary. "For example, what's happening in Iraq right now impacts what's happening in Africa and other parts of the world. So we have to discuss this, because we need to be able to maximize our impact on the ground."

The minister insisted Canada would make its own decision on when and where to send peacekeepers.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter