Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Flaherty takes hard line on spending as Ottawa feels the oil-price pinch

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty delivers a speech to the Economic Club of Canada in Ottawa on Feb. 6, 2013.

ADRIAN WYLD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Ottawa's finances are taking a hit from discounted prices for Canadian oil, and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says this will force him to hold a harder line on spending as he prepares the 2013 budget.

The Finance Minister said lower commodity prices and persistently low inflation are combining to have a negative effect on government revenues. Still, the minister insists he expects to balance the books before the 2015 election without dramatic spending cuts.

"We have to do more on the controlling our own spending side, but we don't have to slash and burn," Mr. Flaherty told reporters after a speech to an Ottawa business audience that outlined the focus of the 2013 budget, which is expected in the next several weeks.

Story continues below advertisement

Spending cuts are already scheduled to ramp up to $5.2-billion a year over the coming two years as part of a phased-in plan to scale back spending announced in the 2012 budget. The upcoming budget is not expected to include major additional spending cuts. Rather, Mr. Flaherty is signalling that Canadians shouldn't expect much new spending.

Still, the government has faced continued challenges from Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page, who says Ottawa is not being transparent about its cuts. The PBO has said Ottawa appears to be cutting front-line services in spite of Mr. Flaherty's assurances that cuts would affect only the "back office" of the federal bureaucracy.

The gap between Alberta heavy oil and the benchmark North American crude has widened considerably in the past two years. Alberta crude, which is thicker and needs more refining, typically sold for $18 less a barrel than West Texas Intermediate, but it is now about $34 a barrel cheaper. The discount was more than $40 late last year.

Oil prices are already forcing the government of Alberta deep into the red as problems over pipelines and access to markets force Canadian oil producers to sell their product at deep discounts, leading to lower profits and, in turn, lower tax revenue for the province and Ottawa.

Last week, Alberta Premier Alison Redford said the province's oil and gas revenues would drop by $6-billion from earlier budget projections. While Ottawa does not collect direct royalties as the provinces do, the declining profits would reduce federal corporate income taxes. In 2011, Ottawa collected $1.2-billion in taxes from the industry, according to Statistics Canada.

"It is obviously a concern, not only in Alberta, but in our government, about commodity prices, the price of oil," Mr. Flaherty said. "The reality that Canadian crude is being sold at a very substantial discount compared to international markets. So that's a concern, and, yes, it affects our budgeting."

In his November fiscal update, Mr. Flaherty revised his projected deficit for this fiscal year to $26-billion from the $21.1-billion estimated last March, a worsening forecast he attributed to lower commodity prices and slower-than-expected economic growth.

Story continues below advertisement

Bank of Nova Scotia economist Patricia Mohr said most commodities held their ground in 2012, but Canadian oil prices were down 25 per cent in December, 2012, compared to a year earlier, with oil-sands crude down 33 per cent. Prices have picked up since the end of the year, with a barrel of heavy oil selling in January for about $61 (U.S.), up from an average of $57.84 in December.

Ms. Mohr said the oil sector has become increasingly important in the Canadian economy, adding that Canada urgently needs new pipelines to diversify the market for its crude exports.

"It's a very crude-oil-dominated economy now in Canada," she said. "And if revenues go down, that affects tax receipts for governments and their ability to finance social services."

Mr. Flaherty cautioned on Wednesday that new spending must fit into the government's plan to balance the budget by 2015, even as municipalities, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Canada West Foundation released a report calling for a new long-term deal on infrastructure.

The Globe and Mail reported earlier this week that the budget is expected to include a such a deal, but it appears Mr. Flaherty plans to keep cities guessing until budget day.

The minister noted that Ottawa is committed to transferring about $3-billion a year to municipalities through the gas tax fund and a GST rebate.

Story continues below advertisement

"What has not been decided is where we go in addition to that, if we go in addition to that, being mindful of our fiscal situation," he said.

Mr. Flaherty's previous two budgets committed Ottawa to work with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities on a new infrastructure deal in addition to the gas tax transfer and the GST credit. The federation is calling for total annual transfers of $5.75-billion over 20 years.

Brock Carlton, the CEO of the FCM, attended Mr. Flaherty's speech and said his organization's discussions with the government lead him to expect the budget will include some new infrastructure cash.

"We've been working with the government for two years on this," he said. "We've had really constructive discussions. There's nothing that indicates to us that they are thinking of not including additional infrastructure investments in the federal budget.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Authors
Parliamentary reporter

A member of the Parliamentary Press Gallery since 1999, Bill Curry worked for The Hill Times and the National Post prior to joining The Globe in Feb. 2005. Originally from North Bay, Ont., Bill reports on a wide range of topics on Parliament Hill, with a focus on finance. More

Global Energy Reporter

Shawn McCarthy is an Ottawa-based, national business correspondent for The Globe and Mail, covering a global energy beat. He writes on various aspects of the international energy industry, from oil and gas production and refining, to the development of new technologies, to the business implications of climate-change regulations. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.