Skip to main content

Finance Minister Bill Morneau speaks to members of the media as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau looks on at a press conference on tax reforms in Stouffville, Ont., on Monday, Oct. 16, 2017.

Nathan Denette/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Liberal government is revising its proposed changes to small-business tax rules in a way that Finance Minister Bill Morneau says will better target Canada's wealthiest investors.

The government intends to allow incorporated businesses to generate up to $50,000 a year in passive-investment income – equivalent to a return of 5 per cent on $1-million in savings – before controversial new rules aimed at curbing the use of corporations for personal savings would be applied.

Mr. Morneau said this will ensure middle-class business owners are not affected by the change, which the government estimates will apply to less than 3 per cent of the 1.8 million Canadian-controlled private corporations.

Story continues below advertisement

Only the wealthy? The truth about the Liberals' proposed small-business tax reforms

Read also: Morneau opted not to set up blind trust, ethics watchdog says

The proposal to raise taxes on passive investments held in incorporated small businesses was the most controversial element of a sweeping tax plan Mr. Morneau released in July for public consultation. It would have discouraged the use of incorporated small businesses as a vehicle for making passive investments that are unrelated to the company – such as buying shares of other firms.

Wednesday's announcement, which the minister made at a company in New Brunswick, is aimed at addressing small-business owners' concerns that the original proposals would hurt their ability to save for economic downturns, short-term parental or sick leave, or retirement.

The revision received tentative praise from some of the most vocal critics of the initial proposals.

"That is good news," said Shawn Whatley, president of the Ontario Medical Association. "But at the same time, we need to see more details. I am pleased to see that it appears as though the federal government has moved and that we've been successful in advocating that at least some of these unfair changes are going to be adjusted."

A similar view was expressed by Dan Kelly, president of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.

Story continues below advertisement

"It is certainly progress," he said. "The best part is that the government is starting to recognize that passive investment plays an important role. I think it's way too soon to say whether the overall package is going to do the trick to restore business confidence and trust with the government."

Mr. Morneau said the proposed new threshold will ensure the changes affect only the government's stated target: very wealthy people who use small-business structures as a vehicle for paying less tax.

"We understand that many, many small businesses are using their corporations to save for the future by making passive investments," he said. "For the vast majority of corporations, the overwhelming majority, this isn't a problem. But in a very small number of cases, it gives wealthy people an unfair advantage over and above everyone else."

The government says savings that are re-invested in the business would be unaffected by the federal proposals, but the CFIB views that assurance as "murky."

Mr. Morneau had argued that small business owners should take advantage of existing programs – such as registered retirement savings plans and tax-free savings accounts – as their primary vehicle for saving. Business owners responded that strict withdrawal rules for RRSPs make that option unattractive.

The other main aspects of the July proposals included measures aimed at limiting the ability of small business owners to "sprinkle" income to family members who are not directly involved in the business as a way of paying less tax. Another proposal would restrict the conversion of dividend income into lower-taxed capital gains.

Story continues below advertisement

On Monday, Mr. Morneau and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau revised the definition the government will use to determine whether income sprinkling is reasonable and can be exempt from the new rules. It also said the sprinkling provisions would not apply to the lifetime capital-gains exemption.

The Liberals also announced on Monday that the small-business tax rate – which applies to the first $500,000 in active business income – will be reduced from 10.5 per cent to 9 per cent by 2019. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has estimated that cutting the rate to 9 per cent would lead to a drop of about $800-million a year in federal revenue.

Mr. Morneau said the money raised by the new restrictions on small businesses will help pay for the tax cut.

He repeated on Wednesday that the income-sprinkling provisions are expected to raise about $250-million a year in new federal revenue. He said the passive-investment provisions will raise multiples of the $250-million figure, but that it is too early to provide a firm estimate.

The government said its proposals related to passive investment will be released as draft legislation at the time of the 2018 budget.

Lindsay Tedds, an associate professor who specializes in tax policy at the University of Victoria, said Wednesday's announcement addresses the original proposal's "draconian" restrictions on holding passive investments in a business.

"I find it difficult to think that anybody would have any negative reaction to this," she said. "This is a fairly good compromise. It's a very high limit. My only concern is with the whack-a-mole problem. … This clearly incentivizes these corporations with incredibly large portfolios to move off-shore."

Some critics of the original proposals dismissed Mr. Morneau's revisions.

"They've applied a very small bandage to a very flawed package," said Allan Lanthier, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Foundation and a retired senior partner of the consulting firm Ernst & Young. "Investments are already leaving the country. They're going to continue. The outflow is simply going to accelerate."

Conservative finance critic Pierre Poilievre said his party is still studying Mr. Morneau's announcements, noting that it took time for experts to highlight the problems with the initial plan.

"They've admitted that their original proposal was just as bad as we claimed, by virtue of the fact that they're backpedalling on it," he said. "So we will look upon this and other Liberal tax proposals with the suspicion that they deserve."

NDP MP Nathan Cullen said his party will review Mr. Morneau's announcements, but questioned their purpose.

"What's happening this week feels like damage control," he said. "And my concern is that [when] policy rolls out in that context, you're unsure if it's good policy or not because the government is on its heels, backing away."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter