Skip to main content

Senator Claude Carignan said he hopes that with the Liberal government’s support Bill S-231 will quickly go through the House of Commons.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Liberal government has agreed to offer greater protection to journalists and their confidential sources, at the same time as the federal Information Commissioner criticizes the government for a lack of transparency in the release of official records.

A government official confirmed on Thursday that the Liberals will back Bill S-231, which would make it harder for police to obtain search warrants to gain information about journalists' confidential sources.

The author of the bill, Conservative Senator Claude Carignan, said the government will only propose "technical amendments" to the bill, calling the endorsement a "giant step" for freedom of the press.

Story continues below advertisement

The proposed legislation was tabled last November after police sought warrants to obtain the telephone records of a total of eight journalists in Quebec, sometimes going back five years, and to track a reporter using his cellphone. The bill was broadly supported by large media organizations as well as journalists' groups.

Read more: Top news officials urge Senate to pass bill on source protection

Related: Senator tables bill to protect confidentiality of journalists' sources

Opinion: The role of media in our democracy deserves special protection

Canada's rank in the World Press Freedom Index fell to 22nd place this year in large part because of the absence of legal protection for confidential sources.

Mr. Carignan said he hopes that, with the Liberal government's support, the bill, which has already been approved by the Senate, will quickly go through the House of Commons.

"This is an important message that is being sent to law-enforcement authorities," he said in an interview.

Story continues below advertisement

The amendments to be revealed by the government on Friday will aim to ensure that the bill does not have unforeseen consequences on other legislation and does not protect reporters when they are suspected of a crime or are themselves under investigation, sources said.

The government's position will be explained by Marco Mendicino, parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Justice, a government official said.

Meanwhile, Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault used her office's annual report to sharply criticize the government for its "broken promise" to reform the law that provides access to government documents to every Canadian.

"Our investigations reveal, once again, that the Act is being used as a shield against transparency and is failing to meet its policy objective to foster accountability and trust in our government," Ms. Legault said. "Comprehensive reform of the Act is essential and long overdue, especially in the face of the expanding information realities of the 21st century. A lot of work needs to be done before this government can meet its transparency promises."

In her report, the Information Commissioner pointed out that she has particular concerns about the performance of the following agencies in following the Access to Information Act: National Defence, Health Canada, Global Affairs Canada, RCMP, Canada Revenue Agency and Correctional Services Canada.

Mr. Carignan's Bill S-231, which would amend the Criminal Code and the Canada Evidence Act, would not inoculate journalists from police powers to get search warrants, but it would make those powers harder to use.

Story continues below advertisement

For example, only high-court judges could endorse such warrants, instead of lower-ranking justices of the peace, as is currently the case in many circumstances.

Should such judicial permissions be granted, the fruits of any such searches against a journalist would be immediately sealed. Journalists would then have to be notified and given the ability to fight in court, before the police would have access to the data.

Mr. Carignan said the legislation would do a better job of protecting journalists and their sources than the current situation, in which police and judges are asked to abide by a series of legal rulings.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter