Skip to main content

Netflix in campaign to ‘set record straight’ on $500-million pledge for Canadian productions

After staying largely silent in recent days, Netflix has issued a long statement to fight back against the attacks that are widely circulating in Canada.

© Mike Blake / Reuters/REUTERS

After facing widespread criticism from key players in Canada's cultural industries, Netflix Inc. has started a public-relations campaign to "set the record straight" about its pledge to spend $500-million on Canadian productions over the next five years, most notably that that spending will be in addition to its existing plans.

The streaming service and the federal government have faced a series of attacks over the fact the company does not pay sales taxes in Canada and refuses to submit to any quotas on its television productions in the country.

After staying largely silent in recent days, Netflix has issued a long statement to fight back against the attacks that are widely circulating in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: Liberal deal lets Netflix play by own rules in Canadian broadcasting

Read more: Cancon 2.0 and the Netflix deal: The 10 key takeaways

"Since the announcement, we've seen lots of excitement, questions, and even some conspiracy theories about our investment. We'd like to set the record straight," said Corie Wright, Netflix's director of global public policy, in the statement.

For starters, the company is arguing in a new blog post that its recent price increase in Canada was in no way related to the promised investment in Canada, but was rather already in the works.

Secondly, the company said that it did not invest in Canada in return for a tax break from the federal government.

"We have not made any deals about taxes. Our investment was approved under the Investment Canada Act. No tax deals were part of the approval to launch our new Canadian presence," Ms. Wright said.

"Netflix follows tax laws everywhere we operate. Under Canadian law, foreign online services like Netflix aren't required to collect and remit sales tax." The company is stating that its deal with Canadian Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly is for the production of content above and beyond existing plans.

Story continues below advertisement

"Our commitment marks a long-term investment in Canada – not just a next-week, next-month, or next-year investment. That means that now that we've been given the green light to establish a local production presence, we have some planning and hard work to do before we can make any additional official announcements," Ms. Wright said.

Since the Netflix investment was announced on Sept. 28, a number of critics have said the government should have tried to force the U.S.-based company to play by the rules in place for Canadian broadcasters.

"It's unfortunate that the government doesn't hold all broadcasters and distributors to the same rules when they are working in Canada," said David Sparrow, national president of the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists, which represents 23,000 people working in film, television and digital media.

"In Canada, we have created regulations and rules by which companies are allowed to access our Canadian people and marketplace. Netflix and the other over-the-top services are not necessarily contributing to that content creation," he added.

Other online players are more positive, stating Ottawa is looking to the future with the deal with Netflix and, eventually, other digital platforms.

"This was a bold and courageous move in building partnership between government and private enterprise," said Shahrzad Rafati, the founder and chief executive of Vancouver-based BroadbandTV. "Digital is undeniably the future, and whether the government engages with platforms like Netflix or not, they will garner eyeballs and be successful."

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.