Skip to main content

Finance Minister Charles Sousa speaks in Toronto on Feb. 18, 2014

KEVIN VAN PAASSE/THE GLOBE AND MAI

The Ontario government is taking the first steps toward setting up a new provincial pension plan – but is also holding more consultations to work out some details.

The government will table legislation Monday afternoon that would set some basic rules for the pension plan, such as its 2017 start date and the fact it would be managed by an arm's-length agency.

"We are taking the necessary steps to ensure that Ontarians are better able to enjoy their retirement years," Finance Minister Charles Sousa said at a Queen's Park press conference. "And that is something that benefits everyone."

Story continues below advertisement

The Ontario Retirement Pension Plan, to be paid for jointly by workers and their employers, is meant to roughly double Canada Pension Plan benefits. It will be mandatory only for people who do not already have a "comparable" pension through their employer.

Associate Minister Mitzie Hunter said the government will start another round of consultations next year on some pieces of the plan. For instance, the government has to decide what exactly a "comparable" pension is – something that would determine how many companies can get out of joining ORPP. The province must also set a low-income threshold, below which people would not have to contribute to the pension.

The government has already been consulting on the pension plan for the past year. It has set up an advisory panel to help with its work.

Mr. Sousa said Monday he would also introduce long-awaited legislation to allow for Pooled Registered Pension Plans, voluntary plans that companies and individual workers can buy into.

The ORPP is a key policy of the Liberal government, which argues it is the best way to fix the retirement savings crunch in this country. In a sign, perhaps, of how important the government sees the need for a pension plan to be, Mr. Sousa even paraphrased Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address at the press conference Monday.

"No one will likely remember what we say here today," he said. "But people will remember what we are doing here today."

But the federal government and the small business lobby is against the ORPP, arguing businesses shouldn't be forced to pay more to help their employees' retirements. They have labelled the new pension plan a "payroll tax." Mr. Sousa dismissed that as an "extreme point of view."

Story continues below advertisement

"These are premiums. These are contributions made by individuals into their savings plan for themselves. None of this money comes to the coffers of the government. It's managed outside of government," he said. "They made this same argument about CPP in the 1960s. They were wrong then, and they're wrong now."

Progressive Conservative MPP Julia Munro contended the government should be consulting more on the pension plan. She said that, given its potential to drive up business costs, it has not been sufficiently debated. The government's consultations to date, she argued, have not allowed enough people to voice their concerns.

"There hasn't been a fulsome debate or conversation," she said. "We need to have a broader public conversation, so people understand what in fact they are potentially looking for."

New Democrat Leader Andrea Horwath said that, instead of setting up a pension plan on its own, the province should wait until the next federal election, in case the NDP wins and enhances CPP instead.

"We'll see what happens next year," she said.

The government has said the ORPP could be rolled into CPP if Ottawa ever changes its mind and decides to enhance CPP.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.