Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Short-form census stays 'as is,' PMO says after Tory MP predicts its demise

Conservative MP Rick Dykstra speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on March 27, 2009.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Harper government is pouring cold water on a Conservative MP's suggestion that this year's short-form census might be the last one Canadians are ever required to complete.

The Tories faced a backlash from researchers, economists and business groups in 2010 when they converted the longer, 50-plus-question version of the census to a voluntary survey. The mandatory long form used to go to one-fifth of Canadian households.

All households must still fill out the short-form census, which contains 10 questions seeking basic information from birth dates to languages spoken.

Story continues below advertisement

St. Catharines, Ont., Conservative MP Rick Dykstra revived the census controversy on Thursday after he told his local paper that the Conservatives would make the short-form optional, too.

"We've already changed the long-form census so that it is not mandatory, and that is, frankly, the road we are going with the short-form census as well," Mr. Dykstra told The Standard in St. Catharines. "I frankly don't think this is the sort of thing a person should be penalized to do."

Within hours, the Prime Minister's Office overruled Mr. Dykstra, saying the mandatory 10-question survey is not headed for the scrap heap.

"The short-form census will remain as is," PMO spokesman Dimitri Soudas said.

That may not be the end of the matter, however.

Statistics Canada is investigating whether to ditch the mandatory short-form census in favour of alternatives such as data mining, chief statistician Wayne Smith said in a February interview with The Globe and Mail.

It was the Harper government who requested this review, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

The Conservatives, who scrapped the mandatory long-form census on the grounds it was wrong to coerce Canadians into answering intrusive questions, has asked Statistics Canada to rethink the way it collects population data, according to Mr. Smith.

Both the 50-question long-form survey – now optional – and the short-form questionnaire that collects basic data are used by researchers, policy makers and economists to get a richly detailed picture of Canada. These users complained bitterly about Ottawa's decision to make the longer survey optional, warning it will erode the quality of data gathered because response rates will fall.

Mr. Smith, who took over from embattled chief statistician Munir Sheikh last summer, has been tasked to study how other countries gather information and report with options that could shape the 2016 census.

Examples range from a register-based census, where governments dip into their records on their citizens, to surveying a different part of the country each year.

"People have suggested that if we could make a register[-based]census work in Canada, we could save buckets of money and avoid annoying a whole bunch of Canadians in asking them to fill out forms," the new chief statistician told The Globe and Mail in February

Register-based surveys – used in parts of Europe – appeal to statisticians because they could pull together all sorts of information. But they could also generate huge privacy concerns.

Story continues below advertisement

On Thursday, StatsCan did not provide a deadline for its report, but said its review "to evaluate options for the 2016 census" would be posted on its website when finished.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Parliamentary reporter

Steven Chase has covered federal politics in Ottawa for The Globe since mid-2001, arriving there a few months before 9/11. He previously worked in the paper's Vancouver and Calgary bureaus. Prior to that, he reported on Alberta politics for the Calgary Herald and the Calgary Sun, and on national issues for Alberta Report. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.