Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

The Economist vents spleen on PM's decision to prorogue

A pedestrian walks past the Centennial Flame on Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2009, when the Conservative government announced it was suspending Parliament until after the Vancouver Olympics

The influential and mostly right-wing British magazine The Economist has taken a dim view of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's decision to prorogue Parliament until after the winter Olympics.

"Mr. Harper's move looks like naked self-interest," the magazine said in a strongly-worded editorial entitled Harper Goes Prorogue that accompanied a longer story on the Canadian Parliamentary suspension.

"His officials faced grilling by parliamentary committees over whether they misled the House of Commons in denying knowledge that detainees handed over to the local authorities by Canadian troops in Afghanistan were being tortured. The government would also have come under fire for its lack of policies to curb Canada's abundant carbon emissions."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Harper is a competent tactician with a ruthless streak, the editorial said.

"He may be right that most Canadians care more about the luge than the legislature, but that is surely true only while their decent system of government is in good hands. They may soon conclude that it isn't."

The longer magazine piece points out that Mr. Harper chose Dec. 30, the day five Canadians were killed in Afghanistan and when the public and the press were further distracted by the announcement of the country's all-important Olympic hockey team, to let his spokesman reveal that Parliament would remain closed until March 3 instead of returning as usual, after its Christmas break, in the last week of January.

Mr. Harper, the story said, clearly reckoned that giving legislators an extra winter break, during which they might visit the Winter Olympics, would not bother Canadians much.

But, suggested the magazine that once called Canada cool and dubbed former prime minister Paul Martin "Mr. Dithers," Mr. Harper may have miscalculated.

"A gathering storm of media criticism has extended even to the Calgary Herald, the main newspaper in his political home city, which denounced him for 'a cynical political play,'" said the story, pointing out that there are a host of demonstrations planned across Canada for the Saturday before Parliament was due to return following the Christmas break.

Proroguing Parliament twice in two years sets what many constitutionalists say is a dangerous precedent, the magazine said.

Story continues below advertisement

"The danger in allowing the prime minister to end discussion any time he chooses is that it makes Parliament accountable to him rather than the other way around."

(Photo: The Canadian Press)

Report an error
About the Author
Parliamentary reporter

Gloria Galloway has been a journalist for almost 30 years. She worked at the Windsor Star, the Hamilton Spectator, the National Post, the Canadian Press and a number of small newspapers before being hired by The Globe and Mail as deputy national editor in 2001. Gloria returned to reporting two years later and joined the Ottawa bureau in 2004. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.