Skip to main content

Politics Process for election of new Liberal leader needs work: Rae

Interim Liberal leader Bob Rae talk with The Globe and Mail editorial board April 12, 2013.

Moe Doiron/The Globe and Mail

Bob Rae says he is broadly happy with the process being used to select his replacement as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, but thinks it should be adjusted in future so that each riding is not given equal say regardless of voter turnout.

"I think it's a well-meaning attempt to make sure that all parts of the country are effectively represented," Mr. Rae said Friday at a meeting with The Globe and Mail's editorial board. "But it does create the problem potentially that somebody could win far more votes than somebody else and still not become the leader. So ideally I think we have to deal with that as time goes on."

Rather than a delegated convention, as in the past, the Liberals are choosing their next leader through a system in which all party members or registered "supporters" are eligible to vote on a preferential ballot from home. Each riding has been allocated 100 points, to be awarded to candidates proportionate to their votes there, with the first candidate to win a majority of the cumulative points declared leader.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Rae acknowledged that the process has caused some confusion among Liberals, and suggested that some of its components – including the weighting system – can be chalked up to an overly ambitious party constitution.

"I'm hoping we can simplify the constitution as time goes on," he said. "I've made that recommendation to the party executive, to try to deconstitutionalize everything – that's part of the challenge of trying to create a more modern process."

Still, Mr. Rae said that he thinks the leadership campaign has marked a significant step toward opening up his party, predicting that more than 90,000 Liberals will have voted by the time results are announced on Sunday.

"There were some people anticipating much, much bigger numbers," he conceded, "but this is a new process.

"Yeah, of course, people are saying 'I'm not quite sure how it works.' If you try something new, you're always going to get some skeptics, but I think it's been pretty successful."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter