Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Researcher blames Harper government for ‘disintegration’ of climate debate

Diana Carney of Canada 2020 says the Harper government needs to take the partisan poison out of the country’s climate debate, and take new actions or fail in its international commitments to reduce emissions.


The Harper government needs to take the partisan poison out of the country's climate debate and enact new policies or fail in its international commitments to reduce emissions, says Diana Carney, top researcher at a progressive think tank in Ottawa.

In a paper released Thursday, Ms. Carney said climate change has become the "third rail" of Canadian politics, with the government using it so aggressively as a "wedge issue" that reasonable debate has been lost. And she placed the blame squarely at the feet of Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Ms. Carney is vice-president of research at Canada 2020, a progressive think tank in Ottawa, and is the wife of Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney. The couple will soon be leaving Ottawa for London, where Mr. Carney will assume the position of Governor of the Bank of England.

Story continues below advertisement

Next week, Canada 2020 will host a forum, with a panel including former Quebec premier Jean Charest and Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, to discuss how to "sell carbon pricing to Canadians."

In her paper, Ms. Carney said there has been a "disintegration of constructive debate" about climate policy at the national level.

Noting that the Conservatives had included a cap-and-trade program in their 2004 and 2008 election platforms, she wrote that the Prime Minister then "entirely turned his back on carbon pricing and deliberately obfuscated by conflating the federal NDP's call for a cap and trade system with carbon taxation ('a tax on everything')." That approach "has effectively turned carbon pricing into a 'third rail' in Canadian politics, which is deeply problematic," she said.

In an interview, Ms. Carney said the Harper government has shown more action than its partisan rhetoric would suggest, and noted that previous Liberal governments did virtually nothing to meet emission reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol.

The Harper government made its U-turn in 2009 after the U.S. Senate failed to pass cap-and-trade legislation that had been approved by the House of Representatives. The Obama administration then promised to use the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate industrial emissions, a regulatory approach that Ottawa is copying.

Ottawa is now negotiating with Alberta and the oil industry to impose national rules on the oil-sands sector, part of its long-promised sectoral regulations. Alberta has tabled a proposal to force industry to cut emissions per barrel by 40 per cent by 2020, and pay a $40 levy on each tonne above that target. Ottawa has its own, less ambitious proposal.

Alberta Premier Alison Redford and Environment Minister Peter Kent travelled to Washington this week to lobby for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. The Canadian politicians insist the country takes seriously its climate commitments.

Story continues below advertisement

But Ms. Carney said Ottawa and the province will have to implement much tougher measures if Canada is to meet its commitment to reduce emissions by 17 per cent from 2005 levels by 2020. She said Canada is now on track to achieve only a 3-per-cent reduction.

"There is presently no basis for a serious claim that we will meet our Copenhagen commitments," she wrote.

To close that gap, Canada needs some form of carbon pricing, perhaps similar to British Columbia's carbon tax, though Ms. Carney's paper offered no firm prescription.

In the interview, she acknowledged that she and "many others" think that "the purer the pricing aspect, the better" – suggesting some form of carbon tax which is favoured by many economists as the least complex and cumbersome approach to carbon pricing.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Global Energy Reporter

Shawn McCarthy is an Ottawa-based, national business correspondent for The Globe and Mail, covering a global energy beat. He writes on various aspects of the international energy industry, from oil and gas production and refining, to the development of new technologies, to the business implications of climate-change regulations. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at