Skip to main content

Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan (right) listens to Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission Chair Paul Godfrey speak during a press conference on Monday, March 12, 2012.

Pawel Dwulit/THE CANADIAN PRESS

If Toronto city council turns down the chance to have a casino, at least half dozen other municipalities in the region are game, sources say.

Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan said the mayors of Mississauga, Markham and Hamilton have all made public statements in favour of a casino in their community. Others have expressed interest, but Mr. Duncan is unwilling to name names.

"There have been some outside the GTA as well, but I'm not sure those municipalities want me naming them at this point," he told reporters on Thursday.

Story continues below advertisement

The source said that, in all, half a dozen communities within the GTA have expressed interest.

The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. is eager to open a casino in Toronto, possibly at Ontario Place on the city's waterfront, a move that would provide the province with some badly needed revenue. Mr. Duncan earlier this week spoke in glowing terms about the benefits of such a development, describing it as an "entertainment destination" that would create 4,000 permanent jobs and generate $3-billion to $4-billion in investment.

But not all Toronto councillors see it that way. The mayor and many suburban councillors endorse the idea, and downtown politicians are slamming it. The issue is a tricky one for the mayor because it cuts across political lines. Some of Rob Ford's traditional supporters, such as Denzil Minnan-Wong, have spoken strongly against casinos, saying they oppose gambling on principal.

"It's not a left or right issue," said councillor Mark Grimes, chair of Exhibition Place. Mr. Grimes said he is open to talking to the province about placing the casino at the lakefront site and thinks council should wait to see details of the proposal before it makes any decisions.

"I want to see what is going to come forward from the province – where is it going to be, what's going to be in it for the city of Toronto?" he said. "Until then, I think it would be a big mistake to say no."

Toronto city council will consider two anti-casino motions on Tuesday. One, from Councillor Mike Layton who represents the ward that includes Ontario Place, asks council to tell the province not to put a casino there. The other raises the issue of a referendum.

The possible location of a casino was one of several questions included in a telephone poll of residents in several wards on Wednesday night. The poll included a number used by Campaign Support, a firm linked to the wife of Mr. Ford's former chief of staff. It listed five possible locations for a casino – Ontario Place, Exhibition Place, the Port Lands, Downsview Park and the Woodbine Racetrack – and asked interview subjects which one they favoured.

Story continues below advertisement

The people polled were also asked to rate how they felt about a casino/hotel complex in Toronto – favourable, or unfavourable, on a scale of 1 to 4. Later in the call, they were asked if their view would change if they knew that a casino/hotel would mean thousands of jobs in Toronto.

Councillor Doug Ford, the mayor's brother and the manager of his campaign for mayor, said on Thursday he knew nothing about the poll. "I have no clue," he said.

Residents of his Etobicoke ward, home to the Woodbine racetrack with its slot machines, want a casino there, he said. "My whole ward, 100 per cent of people are itching to get this project on the go. They want jobs," he said.

Sources within the mayor's office said they were not involved in the poll. Calls to Nick Kouvalis, the mayor's former aide, were not returned.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter