Skip to main content

FILE PHOTO: A cyclist heading eastbound on Bloor St. West manoeuvres between parked vehicles on the left and live traffic on the right, on March 8, 2016. The death of a five-year-old riding his bike next to a high-traffic road has renewed a debate in Canada’s largest city about measures to protect cyclists, prompting some experts and Toronto’s mayor to call for further action.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

The death of a five-year-old riding his bike next to a high-traffic road has renewed a debate in Canada's largest city about measures to protect cyclists, prompting some experts and Toronto's mayor to call for further action.

The boy died Wednesday evening at Sick Kids Hospital after he lost control of his bike, fell onto the road and was hit by a car. The path where he was riding was not on the street, but there were no physical barriers separating bikes from cars.

Mayor John Tory said city officials are to meet Monday to begin a safety review of Toronto's trails.

Story continues below advertisement

"It is past time for us to have a hard look at safety on these trails," Tory said in a statement Sunday.

Matti Siemiatycki, a professor of geography and planning at the University of Toronto, says these kind of accidents put safety at the forefront.

"I think we have to move from the heartbreak of those events to focus on the infrastructure and focus on how our cities are designed. As we grieve, we also have to think, 'How do we prevent the next accident from happening?"' "The roads, for the most vulnerable people travelling, are quite dangerous," he added.

He said infrastructure for active transportation – meaning non-motorized travellers, including cyclists, pedestrians and people using mobility devices – in the city is "varied".

"In some places, quite good infrastructure has been installed for cyclists," he said. "But then in other areas, it's just uneven. It stops and it starts, there are parts that are separated lanes and parts that are not separated."

Siemiatycki noted that the path where the boy was riding – the Martin Goodman Trail, which runs along the city's waterfront, at times right beside Lakeshore Boulevard – is itself problematic.

"You have a separate path, but along a very fast-moving road with no guardrail," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

That type of pathway can be quite dangerous, said Raktim Mitra, a professor at Ryerson University's School of Urban Planning. Cyclists feel safe, given that they're separated from the roadway, but motorists aren't expecting to see bikes.

"In these situations, when these two come closer, there needs to be higher safety measures, such as borders and physical high barriers and things like that," he said.

But generally, Mitra said, not every street needs a separated bike lane with a physical barrier – though they do have some benefit.

"Protected bike lanes give an increased perception of safety for beginner and new cyclists," he said, adding they may encourage more people to travel by bike.

Mitra said that above all else, roads should be designed with clarity in mind – it should be clear where each vehicle belongs, and the road should show cars where the bikes will be.

"On principle, I think as a city, we should show a stronger commitment to road safety," Mitra said. "At least in Toronto, it's been just talk so far."

Story continues below advertisement

Siemiatycki said the city should be taking a holistic approach to making streets safer for people engaging in active transportation.

"That's the key – to think of this as part of a system that encourages active transportation of all different types, and makes that feel safe and welcoming and comfortable, and a viable option for people of all ages and abilities."

He said there are a few things the city can do to accomplish this: build more separated bike lanes, and increase the length of time at crosswalks, allowing slower-moving people to cross safely.

"Our roads tend still to be built in most places predominantly for the automobile, and to move cars as quickly and efficiently as possible, and we're seeing some of the consequences of that."

Chris Spence stepped down from the Toronto District School board amid a plagiarism controversy in 2013. In a video released to The Globe he says he's willing to name under oath the person who wrote the pieces that caused the plagiarism scandal.
Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.