Skip to main content

The battle over the future of Toronto Transit is "not over yet," promises Etobicoke Councillor Doug Ford, arguing the mayor's pledge to build subways would get him re-elected tomorrow.

Mayor Rob Ford will face the greatest test of his leadership when councillors meet on Wednesday to debate his transit plan. The special meeting, which is being held at the request of 24 councillors led by TTC chair Karen Stintz, will pit the mayor's subway vision against the light-rail plan council endorsed three years ago.

Ms. Stintz is asking councillors to reaffirm the 2009 agreement for light-rail lines on Eglinton Avenue, Sheppard Avenue East and Finch Avenue West, and to replace the existing Scarborough Rapid Transit line. At stake is $8.4-billion in provincial transit spending – money initially designated for the 2009 plan, but now earmarked at the mayor's insistence entirely for burying the Eglinton Crosstown line. Mr. Ford has promised to extend the Sheppard subway with private financing.

Story continues below advertisement

The move by Ms. Stintz and her supporters shows a " total disconnect" between the 24 councillors and the public, Mr. Ford said. As TTC chair, Ms. Stintz has played a key role in the Ford administration, but has lost the confidence of the mayor, he said.

"It's sheerly political what's happening right now," he said. "It's a personal attack against the mayor. That's clear."

Asked how the mayor plans to respond, he answered: "Stand by and see what the recourse is."

Ms. Stintz says provincial transit dollars could be better spent – and create more transit for more Torontonians – under the original light-rail plan. The deal that the mayor struck with the province last year to bury the Eglinton line requires council's endorsement, and with a majority of councillors now asking for a special meeting, that appears increasingly unlikely.

"The question for council is, is this the best way to spend $8.4-billion and that question will be answered on Wednesday," Ms. Stintz told reporters.

She also took issue with the mayor's insistence that his election win gave him a mandate to build subways. "There is no funded subway plan, and an underground LRT is not a subway," she said.

To bolster that point, Ms. Stintz released a report late Monday done by KPMG on the funding options for Toronto Transit.

Story continues below advertisement

The study, part of research done for Gordon Chong's report to the mayor on the Sheppard subway, shows all options would leave the project underfunded by at least $1-billion, she said. All the tools the city could use to close that gap would require provincial approval, Ms. Stintz said, and some options, such as hiking development fees across the city, would be a tough sell politically.

In releasing his report last week, Dr. Chong said the city can count on the private sector to fund 50 to 60 per cent of the new subway.

Ms. Stintz used the consultant's study to paint a different picture. "It won't get built unless there is significant City of Toronto tax dollars applied towards this project," she said.

With a report from Patrick White

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.