Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Ford's treatment of TTC chief sends a terrible message

The TTC's Gary Webster is the straightest of straight arrows, a dedicated career public servant who sees his job as giving the best possible advice to city council and the mayor about Toronto's transit needs. Now he is on the verge of being fired for doing just that.

Mr. Webster's apparent crime is failing to be the Fords' parrot and echo their transit refrain: "People want subways." Instead of telling them what they want to hear, he told them what he, as a professional with 35 years of service at the TTC, thinks is right. So, off with his head.

It sends a terrible message to the senior civil servants who keep the city running. "We hire them to be competent, to give us the best advice," councillor Joe Mihevc said in a broadcast interview on Friday, "and today the mayor, through this action, is saying 'No, we don't hire you to give the best advice. We hire you to follow what I think.'"

Story continues below advertisement

Councillor Adam Vaughan, for his part, described Mr. Webster as the least political TTC chief he has seen, and called the threat to fire him "disgraceful."

It is hard to find a milder word. The threat shows the mayor at his worst, as a closed-minded bully who views anyone who expresses a contrary view as some kind of traitor.

The mayor and his circle have been gunning for the TTC and its chief for some time. Mayor Rob Ford's one-time chief of staff Nick Kouvalis, still a Ford pal, has aimed a steady stream of online gibes at Mr. Webster and the transit commission. "Is this guy for real?" he said on Twitter when the TTC head spoke his mind at a special city council meeting last week. "Get with the program or retire already."

Doug Ford himself told The Globe that the TTC needs "a complete enema." When Mr. Webster tried to talk about the St. Clair streetcar project at the special meeting, an angry councillor Ford burst out. "I'm hearing a lot of excuses right now." St. Clair, he said, "was a total disaster for the TTC."

Mr. Webster does not deserve that kind of treatment. A precise, gentlemanly fellow, he is always patient and unflappable at city council when councillors try to score points while questioning him. With Mr. Webster, there is no spin, just the facts.

What really angers the Fords is that the facts in this case are against them. Mr. Webster is merely the messenger.

At the special meeting, he had the temerity to say that, based on all the information in front of him, he backs a plan to build light-rail transit on Eglinton Avenue and other corridors. That put him in the cross-hairs of Mayor Ford and his brother, who want the Eglinton line to go almost entirely underground, forcing the cost up nearly $2-billion and leaving little money for rapid-transit on other streets.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Webster said that light-rail cars are "simply the wrong vehicle" for an all-underground line like the one the Fords want on Eglinton. A network of mostly above-ground light rail is "better value for money, yes sir," he told a questioner. Light rail "is the predominant mode, accepted worldwide" where density does not justify costly subways, he added.

All of that was nothing short of heresy for the Fords. They have been in get-even mode ever since the special meeting went against them, ending in a city council decision to scrap the all-underground plan for Eglinton and go back to a light-rail network that would look much like the Transit City plan championed by mayor David Miller. They are mad as hell at Karen Stintz, the TTC chair who engineered the change, but can't get rid of her for now because all of council would have to go for it. So the knives are out for Mr. Webster.

Successful governments can't work this way. To make good decisions, they need good, impartial information, not yes men. But yes men, apparently, are all the Fords want.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.