Skip to main content

Mayoral candidate Karen Stintz.

michelle siu The Globe and Mail

A former top aide to Karen Stintz, running in her old ward, has broken with the mayoral candidate over transit for Scarborough, calling a subway extension there fiscally irresponsible.

Jean-Pierre Boutros was at the side of Ms. Stintz during the long and protracted battles at council over transit in Scarborough. He was willing to accept a subway in the area until the cost became unacceptable, he said.

"There is better service to be had with that money [for] Scarborough and Toronto, this is not the way to do it," the ward 16 candidate said in an interview. "You have [a light-rail plan] that is approved, that has been vetted by professionals, by transit experts, by city planners and by sensible people. Why choose a plan B?"

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Boutros said he is speaking out now because of his hope that Premier Kathleen Wynne, secure in her new-found majority, will have the confidence to accept that light rail makes more sense for the area. As for the effect of his position on his former boss, he said that it can have an impact only if Ms. Stintz and the other pro-subway candidates are unable to defend their position.

"I believe it is an election issue," Mr. Boutros said. He dubbed the property-tax hike that will pay for part of the transit expansion the Scarborough Subway Tax (SST) and used it to draw a parallel with the unpopular Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) that helped get Rob Ford elected.

"We're taking almost $700-million from the federal government, we're taking a billion [dollars] from us, we're taking $1.5-billion from the provincial government … all of this money doesn't need to be spent."

Mr. Ford and mayoral challengers John Tory and Ms. Stintz want to go ahead with the subway plan. Front-runner Olivia Chow, as well as David Soknacki, prefer light rail in Scarborough.

Rapid transit in Scarborough has been a dominant issue at Toronto council and Queen's Park for more than a year. After much debate, the promise of a $1.8-billion light-rail line in Scarborough, paid for entirely by the province, was spurned by city council in favour of a subway extension that will cost much more. The province would contribute less to the new project, with the remaining price-tag covered with $660-million promised by Ottawa and $1-billion raised from Toronto residents.

To subway-boosters, the debate is over. But critics say the project remains in flux. And much work remains.

As The Globe reported Saturday, the ridership projections are very preliminary and won't be refined until next year. Also, there has been no formal application for the federal contribution and the environmental assessment has not begun. The existing contract for a light-rail line – a deal signed in 2012 between the city, the TTC and the regional transit agency Metrolinx – is still being renegotiated. There is no completion date in sight for those talks and the original master agreement remains in force.

Story continues below advertisement

"We have something on the books that's signed right now, that's good to go," Mr. Boutros said. "Let's do it."

As recently as late last month, Ms. Wynne was asked a few times about Scarborough transit and chose not to state definitively that the province's contribution could be used only for a subway.

"It is the plan that is in place but, as with all of these things, we have to work in co-operation with the municipalities," the Premier told reporters. "There is, you know, there's no point in pretending that there doesn't have to be a good working relationship."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.