Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Review of ice storm may bring change to Toronto’s tree canopy

Toronto Hydro crews continue to repair lines to homes and offices in Scarborough on December 30, 2013.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

Toronto and its city-owned hydro utility plan to examine their tree-maintenance practices to determine whether more can be done to prevent branches from severing and tearing down power lines in bad weather.

The number of trees affected by last week's ice storm is not yet clear. Richard Ubbens, the city's director of parks, said rain, ice and winds damaged a variety of trees throughout the city.

"Young trees, old trees, healthy trees, dead trees, this storm took everything down," Mr. Ubbens said. "It depends on where the ice built up the most."

Story continues below advertisement

There are about 10.2 million trees in Toronto, their canopy covering about 28 per cent of the city. About 600,000 of those trees are city-owned street trees, 3.5 million are in city parks and natural areas, and 6.1 million are on private land.

While the city, businesses and homeowners are responsible for maintaining trees on their properties, Toronto Hydro oversees trimming branches that pose a risk to power lines.

Toronto Hydro spokeswoman Tanya Bruckmueller said the utility has forestry crews and contractors who look for problematic trees to prune. They also respond to concerns from property owners.

The utility's tree program will be reviewed in the wake of the ice storm. However, Ms. Bruckmueller noted a large amount of tree canopy would have to be removed to prevent such damage from occurring again – a measure that would run contrary to the city's goal of increasing tree cover to as much as 40 per cent of Toronto.

Two local arborists see room for improvement in how trees are maintained. Karmatree owner Ryan Kuz and Craig Southwell of Bartlett Tree Experts have spent the past week assessing damaged trees on residential properties, advising owners on whether their trees can still thrive.

Some species, including Siberian elms, silver and Manitoba maples, did not fare well in the storm and their growth needs to be better managed, Mr. Kuz said.

Mr. Southwell noted some trees broke apart because of defects, such as twin stems or twin branches, which could have been dealt with beforehand through pruning or cabling. Other trees were simply too old or too weak.

Story continues below advertisement

"A lot of the trees that are failing now in the city are beyond their useful life expectancy and the city should be replanting," Mr. Southwell said.

In February, city council approved a new forest-management plan that is seeing the city shift to a proactive tree maintenance approach versus its previous model of chiefly reacting to complaints about overgrown or dying trees. A budget increase is being requested for the city's urban-forestry section in 2014.

Overall, 81 per cent of Toronto's tree population was in good condition in 2012, but only 49 per cent of city-owned street trees met this mark, the city's forest-management plan noted.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
National news reporter

Renata joined The Globe and Mail's Toronto newsroom in March of 2011. Raised in the Greater Toronto Area, Renata spent nine years reporting in Alberta for the Calgary Herald and the Edmonton Journal, covering crime, environment and political affairs. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at