Skip to main content

Mayoral candidate Karen Stintz and Doug Ford join CIMA cricket action at the CIMA Mayor's Trophy Cricket Tournament at Sunnybrook Park in Toronto, Ontario, Saturday, Jun 21, 2014.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Karen Stintz says that she and Councillor Doug Ford, who last week accused her campaign of using lists stolen from Mayor Rob Ford's office, have reached "a mutual agreement" even though police say the investigation continues.

But Councillor Ford refused to confirm this Wednesday, and repeated his original allegation that the mayor's property had been taken.

Toronto Police spokesman Mark Pugash confirmed that police met with Councillor Ford Friday, and said that an investigation is continuing.

Story continues below advertisement

Last week, Councillor Ford told reporters that Ms. Stintz, who is running against his brother in the mayoral election, had sent e-mails to residents who have contacted Mayor Ford over the years – addresses kept in a confidential database in the mayor's office. The councillor called it a "breach of security," and alleged Ms. Stintz had "illegally received a contact list from the mayor's office."

On Wednesday, Ms. Stintz said she had spoken with the councillor at a cricket match over the weekend, and they had come to an agreement, though she declined to elaborate on the details.

"As I said, people join my campaign, and when people join my campaign, they bring lists," she said. "That's what a campaign is."

When reached on the phone about whether an agreement had been reached, Councillor Ford said "I have no comment. All I know is that the list has been used, and it's proprietary to the mayor's office. It's city property. It's the mayor's property."

After Councillor Ford made his allegations on Friday, he met with Toronto Police and city officials to report the alleged theft.

Ms. Stintz said that she has not been interviewed by police, nor does she expect she'll be asked to. "As far as I understand it, no investigation was undertaken," she said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.