Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Time is of the essence in Eglinton Crosstown LRT fight

Workmen watch as a cutting head of a tunnel boring machine is lifted from the underground construction site of the Eglinton Crosstown light rail transit (LRT) project in Toronto, Ontario, Canada March 13, 2017.

CHRIS HELGREN/REUTERS

It is the biggest transit project being built in Canada, promised for years and slowly taking shape in Toronto, but how soon the $5.4-billion Eglinton Crosstown light-rail line can be ready has been thrown into doubt by a looming court showdown between manufacturing giant Bombardier Inc. and Ontario transit agency Metrolinx.

Bombardier has gone to court to preserve its $770-million contract to provide transit vehicles in Toronto, arguing that Metrolinx is trying to wiggle out of the deal.

Lawyers for the manufacturing giant‎ argued Tuesday that they have fallen victim to changing transit politics in Toronto, which result in Metrolinx no longer needing all of the vehicles it ordered.

Story continues below advertisement

John Callaghan, acting for Bombardier, told Ontario Superior Court that there is a "great suspicion on our side ... that this is all a matter of leverage."

But Metrolinx counsel Chris Paliare said that the history lesson offered by Bombardier's lawyers was not relevant‎ to the case. The agency has argued that they have other uses for the surplus vehicles. The key issue was the company's ability to produce vehicles on time, said Mr. Paliare, noting that "the slippage is enormous."

Metrolinx filed a formal notice of intent to terminate the contract in October, alleging chronic delays and poor quality work.

Bombardier argued at length Tuesday morning that issues with its performance are based on the assessment of a biased official and that it is fully capable of delivering the vehicles it pledged to build. ‎They say that a new and slower delivery schedule had been accepted by Metrolinx, the regional transit agency that is the arm of the Ontario government.

But Mr. Paliare said there were "never any changes" in writing to the agreed-upon delivery schedule.

Both sides allege they risk major financial and reputation losses. Both argue the other is whining about a contract signed freely and willingly. And both raise the prospect of broader harm if the court rules against them. Another 155 pages of legal documents were released over the weekend, buttressing the few thousand pages already made public. No fewer than 11 lawyers are listed on the latest court documents.

Read more: What has gone wrong since the 'golden age' of Toronto transit

Story continues below advertisement

The crux of it

The legal dispute flows from an assessment last July by Jeffrey Rankin, an official associated with the project, that Bombardier was in default of its contract obligations – alleging chronic delays and poor work. He later said the company did not respond in time to his findings.

Bombardier alleges Mr. Rankin was biased and that his assessment was in error, claiming a new and slower delivery schedule had been agreed on. It argues that it had only seven days to address Mr. Rankin's concerns, as specified by the contract, and so it "did what it could do in the circumstances."

In his own legal filing, Mr. Rankin rejects the allegation of bias, noting that Bombardier knew when it signed the contract about the dual nature of his role – at times representing Metrolinx and at times an impartial decision-maker.

Metrolinx says the claim that it agreed to a slower delivery schedule is "false." The agency also notes it has the absolute right to cancel the contract "for convenience," as long as it provides specified compensation. Given that Bombardier signed a contract allowing that, the agency says, the company cannot say it faces irreparable harm if it is turned down for an injunction.

Transit delayed?

Story continues below advertisement

What this means for long-suffering transit riders in Toronto remains to be seen.

Metrolinx says it had to go to court to protect the Crosstown project. The agency says it still has time to get another vehicle supplier and open the line as scheduled in 2021. It says the dispute-resolution process could take about eight months and, with another court hearing possible after that, it would be impossible to get another supplier and open on time.

Bombardier notes the agency has made positive noises publicly about progress on the project. And it argues there is no evidence another supplier could provide the vehicles in time. "In contrast, [Bombardier] has testified that it will meet those dates," the company states in its factum.

Who will pay the price?

In its own factum, Metrolinx noted that Bombardier had pegged its damages in the event the contract is cancelled at "over $70-million." But the agency would not comment on Monday on how much of the public money earmarked for the vehicle contract – about $870-million once taxes are added – might be available if the agency gets another supplier.

And that money is only part of the costs related to this dispute.

The transit agency has pledged to deliver vehicles to Crosslinx, the consortium building the Crosstown, and says it must pay up to $500,000 a day if they are late. If those delays are the fault of Bombardier, the company must pay the agency only $1,500 per day per vehicle. This raises the prospect that even if Bombardier delivered no vehicles, their penalties would be much smaller than those of Metrolinx.

Bombardier has its own financial concerns. Noting that "public transit in Toronto is a highly political issue," Bombardier alleges Metrolinx, fearing scandal over use of taxpayer funds, has tried to offload its financial risk onto the company. The company states in its legal filing that it has given Metrolinx "two irrevocable standby letters of credit totalling $153-million, which [the agency] may seek to draw on."

The company is also concerned about its intellectual property and worried the end of this contract might hurt future business and its reputation. But Metrolinx, which says Bombardier has a record of failure, quoted Bombardier executive Benoit Brossoit to argue that losing this contract would not hurt the firm.

"In view of Mr. Brossoit's own testimony that the 'terrible press' associated with other high-profile Bombardier failures has not affected the company's 'tremendous global reputation,' there is no evidence, or reason to believe, that Metrolinx's termination of the contract for cause will undo the ongoing 'tremendous global reputation,'" the agency's factum states.

Video: Explore the 1930’s system that directs trains through Toronto’s Union Station (The Globe and Mail)
Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author

Oliver Moore joined the Globe and Mail's web newsroom in 2000 as an editor and then moved into reporting. A native Torontonian, he served four years as Atlantic Bureau Chief and has worked also in Afghanistan, Grenada, France, Spain and the United States. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.