Skip to main content

Toronto Toronto City Council votes to study John Tory’s rail-deck park

Toronto wants to build a downtown park over the open rail corridor between Bathurst and Blue Jays Way.

Courtesy of City of Toronto

Despite grumbling from some suburban councillors about potentially spending hundreds of millions of dollars on green space downtown and not in their own wards, Toronto City Council unanimously approved $2.4-million to study Mayor John Tory's proposal for a "rail-deck park."

In rhetoric reminiscent of the Rob Ford era, Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti said parks in his ward in the city's northwest have been allowed to languish while council contemplates spending $1-billion or more on a megaproject to benefit wealthy downtown condo owners.

"We have roads deteriorating, we've got grass coming out of curbs … our parks don't get cut. It is a disaster in some parts of this city," Mr. Mammoliti said. "And yet we can try to find $1.5-billion to $2-billion or even $3-billion to build a brand new park for a lot of dogs that belong to the rich."

Story continues below advertisement

But even Mr. Mammoliti fell in line after council supported his motion to have city staff report on the "deficiencies in parks in the suburbs" and on "a mechanism to fund parks" that are ready to be built in other parts of the city.

Speaking to reporters, Mr. Tory called the suburbs-versus-downtown rhetoric counterproductive. He argued that the rail-deck park would be a draw for tourists and people across the city, citing Chicago's Millennium Park and the Toronto Islands as examples. It would also, he said, make Toronto's downtown, where parks are at premium and the population is skyrocketing, more livable.

"I am not going to get dragged into .… these kinds of false choices that people present when they say, well you can either be in favour of downtown or the suburbs," Mr. Tory said. "My job as the mayor is to build a complete livable city."

The money approved on Wednesday will see city staff report back next year on the feasibility and costs of obtaining air rights to the site of the proposed park, which would be built on top of a platform spanning the rail corridor south of Front Street West from Bathurst Street to Blue Jays Way.

Staff will also study design concepts and ways to fund the expensive park, including potential new charges imposed on developers who are already required to hand over cash to the city for parkland.

The vote came as private sector developers who claim an interest in the site talked up a competing proposal that would see the rail-deck platform lined with condominiums, offices and stores.

Their plan includes a park less than half the size of Mr. Tory's concept but, they say, at much less cost to the city. The developer, Craft Developments, has declined to reveal whether an agreement it has with the railways to purchase air rights for the site is conditional on zoning. But the developer has threatened to take the city to the Ontario Municipal Board over the move to rezone the area as solely parkland.

Story continues below advertisement

The area's city councillor, Joe Cressy, said the city's version of the rail-deck project was Toronto's last chance to deliver a large and much-needed park to the rapidly growing population downtown. In 1996, just 946 people lived in the neighbourhood around the proposed park, he said. Now, nearly 50,000 call the nearby condo towers home.

"I believe that rail deck park will be a new Central Park for all of Toronto," Mr. Cressy told council. "Not just downtown, but the city as a whole."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter